Evidence based practice in population health: a regional survey to inform workforce development and organisational change

被引:9
作者
Adily, A [1 ]
Ward, J [1 ]
机构
[1] S Western Sydney Area Hlth Serv, Div Populat Hlth, Liverpool 1871, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1136/jech.2003.012278
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Study objective: To assess current capacity to implement evidence based practice (EBP) in population health. Design: Postal survey of a regional population health workforce in Sydney, Australia. Setting: Division of Population Health, South Western Sydney Area Health Service. Participants: 104 population health staff (response rate: 73%). Main results: In the sample of regional population health practitioners, views about the current promotion of EBP were positive. Non-medical respondents with less that Masters degree were more likely to report "high self assessed need'' to increase their capacity in EBP (p=0.022). Confidence in understanding of EBP terminology was not associated with seniority but with highest level of education reached (p<0.000) and having medical qualifications (p<0.000). Occupational category was not associated with respondents' self assessed "need for evidence'', "need for EBP skills'' or "need to increase their capacity in EBP'' in their current position. The proportion of participants "strongly'' supporting implementation of a colorectal cancer screening programme whose benefit was expressed as relative risk reduction was greater than that so supporting a programme whose benefit was expressed as number needed to screen (p=0.008). Most respondents referred to their immediate managers when seeking support for EBP. Conclusions: The findings provide a quantitative baseline for capacity building through workplace programmes. Managerial commitment has been increased and performance development is now underway.
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 460
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CLIN MANAGEMENT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, GUID DEV IMPL EV CLI
[3]  
*AUSTR I HLTH WELF, 2002, AUSTR HLTH 2002
[4]   Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials - The CONSORT statement [J].
Begg, C ;
Cho, M ;
Eastwood, S ;
Horton, R ;
Moher, D ;
Olkin, I ;
Pitkin, R ;
Rennie, D ;
Schulz, KF ;
Simel, D ;
Stroup, DF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (08) :637-639
[5]  
*COMM DEP HLTH FAM, 1997, COL CANC SCREEN REP
[6]   EVIDENCE BASED PURCHASING - UNDERSTANDING RESULTS OF CLINICAL-TRIALS AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS [J].
FAHEY, T ;
GRIFFITHS, S ;
PETERS, TJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (7012) :1056-1059
[7]   Variation in the use of online clinical evidence: a qualitative analysis [J].
Gosling, AS ;
Westbrook, JI ;
Coiera, EW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2003, 69 (01) :1-16
[8]  
Grandes G, 2000, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V50, P803
[9]  
Gray J.A. Muir., 2001, EVIDENCE BASED HEALT, V2nd
[10]   A psychometric experiment in causal inference to estimate evidential weights used by epidemiologists [J].
Holman, CDJ ;
Arnold-Reed, DE ;
de Klerk, N ;
McComb, C ;
English, DR .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 12 (02) :246-255