A selective ensemble based on expected probabilities for bankruptcy prediction

被引:96
作者
Hung, Chihli [1 ]
Chen, Jing-Hong [1 ]
机构
[1] Chung Yuan Christian Univ, Dept Informat Management, Chungli 32023, Tao Yuan County, Taiwan
关键词
Bankruptcy prediction; Selective ensembles; Classifier ensembles; DISCRIMINANT-ANALYSIS; NEURAL NETWORKS; FINANCIAL RATIOS; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2008.06.068
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Bankruptcy prediction is one of the major business classification topics. Both statistical approaches and artificial intelligence techniques have been explored for this topic. Most researchers compare the prediction performance using different techniques for a specific data set. However, there are no consistent results to show that one technique is better than the other. Different techniques have different advantages and disadvantages on different data sets. Recent studies suggest combining multiple classifiers may have a better performance. However, such an ensemble is usually not only to inherit advantages from the different classifiers but also suffers from disadvantages of those classifiers. In this paper. we propose a selective ensemble of three classifiers, i.e. the decision tree, the back propagation neural network and the support vector machine. Based on the expected probabilities of both bankruptcy and non-bankruptcy, this ensemble provides an approach which inherits advantages and avoids disadvantages of different classification techniques. Consequently, our selective ensemble performs better than other weighting or voting ensembles for bankruptcy prediction. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5297 / 5303
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   FINANCIAL RATIOS, DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS AND PREDICTION OF CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY [J].
ALTMAN, EI .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1968, 23 (04) :589-609
[2]   CORPORATE DISTRESS DIAGNOSIS - COMPARISONS USING LINEAR DISCRIMINANT-ANALYSIS AND NEURAL NETWORKS (THE ITALIAN EXPERIENCE) [J].
ALTMAN, EI ;
MARCO, G ;
VARETTO, F .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 1994, 18 (03) :505-529
[3]  
[Anonymous], Data Mining Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques with Java
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1987, LEARNING INTERNAL RE
[5]  
Balcaen S., 2004, 248 GHENT U DEP ACC
[6]   An empirical comparison of voting classification algorithms: Bagging, boosting, and variants [J].
Bauer, E ;
Kohavi, R .
MACHINE LEARNING, 1999, 36 (1-2) :105-139
[7]  
BEAVER W, 1996, J ACCOUNT RES, V4, P71
[8]  
Breiman L, 1996, MACH LEARN, V24, P123, DOI 10.1023/A:1018054314350
[9]  
Breiman L., 1984, Classification and regression trees, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781315139470
[10]  
CORTES C, 1995, MACH LEARN, V20, P273, DOI 10.1023/A:1022627411411