Optimizing the treatment of ovarian cancer: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking versus primary debulking surgery for epithelial ovarian cancers likely to have suboptimal resection

被引:30
|
作者
Gill, Sarah E. [1 ]
McGree, Michaela E. [2 ]
Weaver, Amy L. [2 ]
Cliby, William A. [1 ]
Langstraat, Carrie L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Gynecol Surg, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Biomed Stat & Informat, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Interval debulking surgery; Ovarian cancer; Unresectable; PRIMARY CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY; ADVANCED-STAGE OVARIAN; GYNECOLOGIC-ONCOLOGY-GROUP; IMPROVED SURVIVAL; CARCINOMA; DISEASE; TRIAL; PROGNOSIS; COMPLICATIONS; PACLITAXEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.11.021
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. To: a) identify prognostic factors in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulldng surgery (IDS), and b) compare post-surgical survival between patients treated with NACT/IDS for presumed unresectable disease and stage IIIC/IV patients who underwent suboptimal primary debulking surgery (PDS). Methods. This was a retrospective study of consecutive stage IIIC or IV patients undergoing IDS after NACT at Mayo Clinic from January 2007 to December 2013. A subset of patients receiving NACT/IDS for the indication of unresectable disease were matched 1:1 on age and stage to a cohort of patients who underwent suboptimal PDS between 2003 and 2011. Hazard ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were estimated from Cox proportional hazards models. Results. We identified 87 patients treated with NACT/IDS: the median OS and PFS following surgery was 2.4 and 1.0 years, respectively. Factors associated with significantly worse OS were older age (adjusted HR 1.60 per 10-year increase in age, 95% CI 1.18, 2.16) and elevated CA-125 before IDS (adjusted HR 2.30 for CA-125 >35 U/mL, 95% CI 1.25, 423). Number of adjuvant chemotherapy cycles administered did not have a significant effect on survival. In the matched cohort analysis of presumed unresectable cases undergoing NACT/IDS vs suboptimal PDS cases (n = 45 each), the NACT/IDS group had a significant OS advantage (HR 0.53; 95% CI 032, 0.88), and fewer patients experienced a 30-day postoperative Accordion grade 3/4 complication (11% vs 36%, P = 0.01). Conclusions. Younger age and normalization of CA-125 prior to IDS are associated with improved survival with NAG:LADS. For primary EOC where resection to residual disease of 1 cm or less is unlikely, NACT/IDS is associated with improved survival and reduced perioperative morbidity compared to PDS. As these patients are likely best served by NACT/IDS, more reliable predictors of resectability would be valuable. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 273
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery versus primary debulking surgery in the advanced epithelial ovarian cancer - a retrospective cohort study
    Maricic, Slobodan
    Mandic, Aljosa
    Dejanovic, Ninoslav
    Kladar, Nebojsa
    Popovic, Marina
    Ivkovic-Kapicl, Tatjana
    Gutic, Bojana
    Kokanov, Dunja
    VOJNOSANITETSKI PREGLED, 2021, 78 (11) : 1193 - 1199
  • [2] Primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with advanced ovarian cancer
    Zheng, Hong
    Gao, Yu-Nong
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 24 (04) : 304 - 309
  • [3] Primary debulking surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma
    Seward, Shelly M.
    Winer, Ira
    CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEWS, 2015, 34 (01) : 5 - 10
  • [4] Patient preferences for attributes of primary surgical debulking versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for treatment of newly diagnosed ovarian cancer
    Havrilesky, Laura J.
    Yang, Jui-Chen
    Lee, Paula S.
    Secord, Angeles Alvarez
    Ehrisman, Jessie A.
    Davidson, Brittany
    Berchuck, Andrew
    Darcy, Kathleen M.
    Maxwell, G. Larry
    Reed, Shelby D.
    CANCER, 2019, 125 (24) : 4399 - 4406
  • [5] Primary debulking surgery vs. neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with advanced ovarian cancer
    Bian, Ce
    Yao, Kui
    Li, Li
    Yi, Tao
    Zhao, Xia
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2016, 293 (01) : 163 - 168
  • [6] Primary Cytoreductive Surgery Versus Interval Debulking Surgery Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Institutional Review
    Ahmad, Zeeshanuddin
    Jain, Amar
    Mehta, Nikhil
    Saldanha, Elroy
    Patel, Dhruv
    Desai, Sanjay M.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 17 (01)
  • [7] Clinical significance of primary debulking surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy-interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer
    Nishio, Shin
    Ushijima, Kimio
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 50 (04) : 379 - 386
  • [8] Interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
    Tangjitgamol, Siriwan
    Manusirivithaya, Sumonmal
    Laopaiboon, Malinee
    Lumbiganon, Pisake
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (01):
  • [9] Primary Debulking Surgery Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Propensity-matched Analysis
    Siesto, Gabriele
    Cavina, Raffaele
    Romano, Fabrizio
    Vitobello, Domenico
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2018, 41 (03): : 280 - 285
  • [10] Primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with advanced ovarian cancer
    Hong Zheng
    Yu-Nong Gao
    ChineseJournalofCancerResearch, 2012, 24 (04) : 304 - 309