End-expiratory occlusion manoeuvre does not accurately predict fluid responsiveness in the operating theatre

被引:36
作者
Guinot, P. -G. [1 ]
Godart, J. [1 ]
de Broca, B. [1 ]
Bernard, E. [1 ]
Lorne, E. [1 ]
Dupont, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Amiens Univ Hosp, Anaesthesiol & Crit Care Dept, F-80054 Amiens, France
关键词
anaesthesia; cardiac output monitoring; end-expiratory occlusion; end-tidal carbon dioxide; intraoperative monitoring; TIDAL CARBON-DIOXIDE; VOLUME RESPONSIVENESS; ARTERIAL-PRESSURE;
D O I
10.1093/bja/aet582
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background. The objective of this study was to determine whether assessment of stroke volume (SV) and measurement of exhaled end-tidal carbon dioxide (E'(CO2)) during an end-expiratory occlusion (EEO) test can predict fluid responsiveness in the operating theatre. Methods. Forty-two subjects monitored by oesophageal Doppler who required i.v. fluids during surgery were studied. Haemodynamic variables [heart rate, non-invasive arterial pressure, SV, cardiac output (CO), respiratory variation of SV (Delta respSV), variation of SV during EEO, and E'(CO2)] were measured at baseline, during EEO (Delta(EEO)), and after fluid expansion. Responders were defined by an increase in SV over 15% after infusion of 500 ml of crystalloid solution. Results. Of the 42 subjects, 28(67%) responded to fluid infusion. A cut-off of >2.3% Delta SVEEO predicted fluid responsiveness with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUC) curve of 0.78 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.63-0.89, P=0.003]. The AUC of Delta respSV was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.76-0.97, P<0.001). With an AUC of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.51-0.81, P=0.07), Delta E'(CO2EEO). was poorly predictive of fluid responsiveness. Conclusions. Delta SVEEO and Delta E'(CO2), were unable to accurately predict fluid responsiveness during surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1050 / 1054
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Automated pulse pressure and stroke volume variations from radial artery: evaluation during major abdominal surgery [J].
Derichard, A. ;
Robin, E. ;
Tavernier, B. ;
Costecalde, M. ;
Fleyfel, M. ;
Onimus, J. ;
Lebuffe, G. ;
Chambon, J. -P. ;
Vallet, B. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2009, 103 (05) :678-684
[2]   END-TIDAL CARBON-DIOXIDE CONCENTRATION DURING CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION [J].
FALK, JL ;
RACKOW, EC ;
WEIL, MH .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1988, 318 (10) :607-611
[3]   Hemodynamic impact of a positive end-expiratory pressure setting in acute respiratory distress syndrome: Importance of the volume status [J].
Fougeres, Emilie ;
Teboul, Jean-Louis ;
Richard, Christian ;
Osman, David ;
Chemla, Denis ;
Monnet, Xavier .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (03) :802-807
[4]   EXPIRED CARBON-DIOXIDE - A NONINVASIVE MONITOR OF CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION [J].
GUDIPATI, CV ;
WEIL, MH ;
BISERA, J ;
DESHMUKH, HG ;
RACKOW, EC .
CIRCULATION, 1988, 77 (01) :234-239
[5]   Ability of stroke volume variation measured by oesophageal Doppler monitoring to predict fluid responsiveness during surgery [J].
Guinot, P. -G. ;
de Broca, B. ;
Abou Arab, O. ;
Diouf, M. ;
Badoux, L. ;
Bernard, E. ;
Lorne, E. ;
Dupont, H. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 110 (01) :28-33
[6]   A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Use of Preemptive Hemodynamic Intervention to Improve Postoperative Outcomes in Moderate and High-Risk Surgical Patients [J].
Hamilton, Mark A. ;
Cecconi, Maurizio ;
Rhodes, Andrew .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2011, 112 (06) :1392-1402
[7]  
ISSERLES SA, 1991, ANESTH ANALG, V73, P808
[8]   Dynamic indices do not predict volume responsiveness in routine clinical practice [J].
Lansdorp, B. ;
Lemson, J. ;
van Putten, M. J. A. M. ;
de Keijzer, A. ;
van der Hoeven, J. G. ;
Pickkers, P. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2012, 108 (03) :395-401
[9]   Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares [J].
Marik, Paul E. ;
Baram, Michael ;
Vahid, Bobbak .
CHEST, 2008, 134 (01) :172-178
[10]   Using heart-lung interactions to assess fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation [J].
Michard, F ;
Teboul, JL .
CRITICAL CARE, 2000, 4 (05) :282-289