Dabigatran versus Warfarin in Patients with Mechanical Heart Valves

被引:1043
|
作者
Eikelboom, John W. [1 ]
Connolly, Stuart J. [1 ]
Brueckmann, Martina [2 ,3 ]
Granger, Christopher B. [4 ]
Kappetein, Arie P. [5 ]
Mack, Michael J. [7 ]
Blatchford, Jon [8 ]
Devenny, Kevin [8 ]
Friedman, Jeffrey [9 ]
Guiver, Kelly [8 ]
Harper, Ruth [8 ]
Khder, Yasser [10 ]
Lobmeyer, Maximilian T. [2 ]
Maas, Hugo [2 ]
Voigt, Jens-Uwe [11 ]
Simoons, Maarten L. [6 ]
Van de Werf, Frans [11 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Hamilton Hlth Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Boehringer Ingelheim KG, Ingelheim, Germany
[3] Heidelberg Univ, Fac Med Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
[4] Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[5] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[7] Heart Hosp Baylor, Plano, TX USA
[8] Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH & Co KG, Bracknell, Berks, England
[9] Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceut Inc, Ridgefield, CT 06877 USA
[10] Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH & Co KG, Paris, France
[11] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Cardiovasc Sci, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; RANDOMIZED EVALUATION; HEALTHY-VOLUNTEERS; ETEXILATE; REPLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa1300615
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundDabigatran is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor that has been shown to be an effective alternative to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. We evaluated the use of dabigatran in patients with mechanical heart valves. MethodsIn this phase 2 dose-validation study, we studied two populations of patients: those who had undergone aortic- or mitral-valve replacement within the past 7 days and those who had undergone such replacement at least 3 months earlier. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either dabigatran or warfarin. The selection of the initial dabigatran dose (150, 220, or 300 mg twice daily) was based on kidney function. Doses were adjusted to obtain a trough plasma level of at least 50 ng per milliliter. The warfarin dose was adjusted to obtain an international normalized ratio of 2 to 3 or 2.5 to 3.5 on the basis of thromboembolic risk. The primary end point was the trough plasma level of dabigatran. ResultsThe trial was terminated prematurely after the enrollment of 252 patients because of an excess of thromboembolic and bleeding events among patients in the dabigatran group. In the as-treated analysis, dose adjustment or discontinuation of dabigatran was required in 52 of 162 patients (32%). Ischemic or unspecified stroke occurred in 9 patients (5%) in the dabigatran group and in no patients in the warfarin group; major bleeding occurred in 7 patients (4%) and 2 patients (2%), respectively. All patients with major bleeding had pericardial bleeding. ConclusionsThe use of dabigatran in patients with mechanical heart valves was associated with increased rates of thromboembolic and bleeding complications, as compared with warfarin, thus showing no benefit and an excess risk. (Funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01452347 and NCT01505881.) In a phase 2 trial, patients with mechanical heart valves were randomly assigned to receive either dabigatran or warfarin for anticoagulation. Dabigatran was associated with higher rates of ischemic stroke (5%, vs. 0% with warfarin) and major bleeding (4% vs. 2%). Prosthetic heart-valve replacement is recommended for many patients with severe valvular heart disease and is performed in several hundred thousand patients worldwide each year.(1) Mechanical valves are more durable than bioprosthetic valves(2) but typically require lifelong anticoagulant therapy. The use of vitamin K antagonists provides excellent protection against thromboembolic complications in patients with mechanical heart valves(3) but requires restrictions on food, alcohol, and drugs and lifelong coagulation monitoring. Because of the limitations of vitamin K antagonists, many patients opt for a bioprosthesis rather than a mechanical valve, despite the higher risk of premature valve failure requiring repeat valve-replacement surgery with ...
引用
收藏
页码:1206 / 1214
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effectiveness of dabigatran etexilate for thromboprophylaxis of mechanical heart valves
    McKellar, Stephen H.
    Abel, Stuart
    Camp, Christopher L.
    Suri, Rakesh M.
    Ereth, Mark H.
    Schaff, Hartzell V.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 141 (06) : 1410 - 1416
  • [2] Dabigatran versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
    Connolly, Stuart J.
    Ezekowitz, Michael D.
    Yusuf, Salim
    Eikelboom, John
    Oldgren, Jonas
    Parekh, Amit
    Pogue, Janice
    Reilly, Paul A.
    Themeles, Ellison
    Varrone, Jeanne
    Wang, Susan
    Alings, Marco
    Xavier, Denis
    Zhu, Jun
    Diaz, Rafael
    Lewis, Basil S.
    Darius, Harald
    Diener, Hans-Christoph
    Joyner, Campbell D.
    Wallentin, Lars
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 361 (12) : 1139 - 1151
  • [3] A comparison of dabigatran etexilate with warfarin in patients with mechanical heart valves: The Randomized, phase II study to Evaluate the sAfety and pharmacokinetics of oraL dablGatran etexilate in patients after heart valve replacemeNt (RE-ALIGN)
    Van de Werf, Frans
    Brueckmann, Martina
    Connolly, Stuart J.
    Friedman, Jeffrey
    Granger, Christopher B.
    Haertter, Sebastian
    Harper, Ruth
    Kappetein, Arie Pieter
    Lehr, Thorsten
    Mack, Michael J.
    Noack, Herbert
    Eikelboom, John W.
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2012, 163 (06) : 931 - +
  • [4] Dabigatran versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism.
    Schulman, Sam
    Kearon, Clive
    Kakkar, Ajay K.
    Mismetti, Patrick
    Schellong, Sebastian
    Eriksson, Henry
    Baanstra, David
    Schnee, Janet
    Goldhaber, Samuel Z.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 361 (24) : 2342 - 2352
  • [5] Dabigatran Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation An Analysis of Patients Undergoing Cardioversion
    Nagarakanti, Rangadham
    Ezekowitz, Michael D.
    Oldgren, Jonas
    Yang, Sean
    Chernick, Michael
    Aikens, Timothy H.
    Flaker, Greg
    Brugada, Josep
    Kamensky, Gabriel
    Parekh, Amit
    Reilly, Paul A.
    Yusuf, Salim
    Connolly, Stuart J.
    CIRCULATION, 2011, 123 (02) : 131 - 136
  • [6] Dabigatran is Less Effective Than Warfarin at Attenuating Mechanical Heart Valve-Induced Thrombin Generation
    Jaffer, Iqbal H.
    Stafford, Alan R.
    Fredenburgh, James C.
    Whitlock, Richard P.
    Chan, Noel C.
    Weitz, Jeffrey I.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2015, 4 (08): : e002322
  • [7] Optimal Intensity of Warfarin Therapy in Patients With Mechanical Aortic Valves
    Kido, Kazuhiko
    Ball, Jennifer
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2019, 32 (01) : 93 - 98
  • [8] Warfarin versus dabigatran etexilate: an assessment of efficacy and safety in patients with atrial fibrillation
    Dzeshka, Mikhail S.
    Lip, Gregory Y. H.
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2015, 14 (01) : 45 - 62
  • [9] Dabigatran versus Warfarin for the Treatment of Pediatric Thromboembolism: A Pilot Randomized Trial
    Eghbali, Aziz
    Afzal, Roghayyeh Rahimi
    Sheykhbeygloo, Roya
    Eghbali, Aygin
    Taherkhanchi, Bahar
    Bagheri, Bahador
    PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 26 (03) : 338 - 342
  • [10] Insights from the dabigatran versus warfarin trial in patients with venous thromboembolism (the RE-COVER trial)
    Prandoni, Paolo
    Taher, Ali
    EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2010, 11 (06) : 1035 - 1037