Measuring time preferences: Comparing methods and evaluating the magnitude effect

被引:16
作者
Hermann, Daniel [1 ]
Musshoff, Oliver [1 ]
机构
[1] Georg August Univ Gottingen, Pl Gottinger Sieben 5, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
关键词
Discount rate; Experimental economics; Intertemporal decision-making; Magnitude effect; INDIVIDUAL DISCOUNT RATES; LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS; RISK ATTITUDES; ELICITATION; SELECTION; BEHAVIOR; FARMERS; MARKETS;
D O I
10.1016/j.socec.2016.09.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The discount rate is of great importance for all decisions in an intertemporal context. This study experimentally investigates the time preferences of German farmers and students by comparing two methods of discount rate elicitation. The first method is based on the elicitation of time preference and risk attitude using two multiple price lists. Afterward, the discount rate is estimated by taking the risk attitude into account. The second method also uses a multiple price list approach; however, in contrast to the first method, probability discounting is applied for eliciting time preference. In this case, the individual risk attitude is not elicited separately, and no assumptions regarding the shape of the utility function are necessary. Both methods are conducted in two magnitude treatments, using 100 and 300 as a baseline. The results reveal that the ascertained discount rates of both methods are different for farmers in both magnitude treatments and for students in the 300 treatment. This result contradicts previous findings on the comparison of these two methods. Furthermore, only the method based on the measurement of time preference and risk attitude separately reveals significant responsiveness to the magnitude of the experimental payout. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 26
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Anderhub V., 2001, GER ECON REV, V2, P239, DOI [10.1111/1468-0475.00036, DOI 10.1111/1468-0475.00036]
[2]   Eliciting risk and time preferences [J].
Andersen, Steffen ;
Harrison, Glenn W. ;
Lau, Morten I. ;
Rutstrom, E. Elisabet .
ECONOMETRICA, 2008, 76 (03) :583-618
[3]   Elicitation using multiple price list formats (vol 9, pg 383, 2006) [J].
Andersen, Steffen ;
Harrison, Glenn W. ;
Lau, Morten Igel ;
Rutstrom, E. Elisabet .
EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 12 (01) :99-100
[4]   Discounting behavior: A reconsideration [J].
Andersen, Steffen ;
Harrison, Glenn W. ;
Lau, Morten I. ;
Rutstroem, E. Elisabet .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 71 :15-33
[5]   Discounting Behaviour and the Magnitude Effect: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Denmark [J].
Andersen, Steffen ;
Harrison, Glenn W. ;
Lau, Morten I. ;
Rutstroem, E. Elisabet .
ECONOMICA, 2013, 80 (320) :670-697
[6]   Preference heterogeneity in experiments: Comparing the field and laboratory [J].
Andersen, Steffen ;
Harrison, Glenn W. ;
Lau, Morten Igel ;
Rutstrom, E. Elisabet .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2010, 73 (02) :209-224
[7]   Individual decision-making experiments with risk and intertemporal choice [J].
Anderson, Lisa R. ;
Stafford, Sarah L. .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2009, 38 (01) :51-72
[8]   Measuring time preferences: A comparison of experimental methods [J].
Andreoni, James ;
Kuhn, Michael A. ;
Sprenger, Charles .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2015, 116 :451-464
[9]   Estimating Time Preferences from Convex Budgets [J].
Andreoni, James ;
Sprenger, Charles .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (07) :3333-3356
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1959, INDIVIDUAL CHOICE BE