Methods for Evaluating Emotions Evoked by Food Experiences: A Literature Review

被引:90
作者
Kaneko, Daisuke [1 ,2 ]
Toet, Alexander [3 ]
Brouwer, Anne-Marie [3 ]
Kellen, Victor [2 ]
van Erp, Jan B. F. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Kikkoman Europe R&D Lab BV, Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] TNO, Microbiol & Syst Biol, Zeist, Netherlands
[3] TNO, Perceptual & Cognit Syst, Soesterberg, Netherlands
[4] Univ Twente, Human Media Interact, Enschede, Netherlands
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2018年 / 9卷
关键词
food-evoked emotion; physiological; behavioral; cognitive; toolbox; emotional processing level; OLDER NORMOSMIC ADULTS; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; FACIAL EXPRESSIONS; NEGATIVE AFFECT; CONSUMER PREFERENCES; POSITIVE AFFECT; YOUNGER ADULTS; TIME-COURSE; RESPONSES; LIKING;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00911
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Besides sensory characteristics of food, food-evoked emotion is a crucial factor in predicting consumer's food preference and therefore in developing new products. Many measures have been developed to assess food-evoked emotions. The aim of this literature review is (i) to give an exhaustive overview of measures used in current research and (ii) to categorize these methods along measurement level (physiological, behavioral, and cognitive) and emotional processing level (unconscious sensory, perceptual/early cognitive, and conscious/decision making) level. This 3 x 3 categorization may help researchers to compile a set of complementary measures ('toolbox") for their studies. We included 101 peer-reviewed articles that evaluate consumer's emotions and were published between 1997 and 2016, providing us with 59 different measures. More than 60% of these measures are based on self-reported, subjective ratings and questionnaires (cognitive measurement level) and assess the conscious/decision-making level of emotional processing. This multitude of measures and their overrepresentation in a single category hinders the comparison of results across studies and building a complete multi-faceted picture of food-evoked emotions. We recommend (1) to use widely applied, validated measures only, (2) to refrain from using (highly correlated) measures from the same category but use measures from different categories instead, preferably covering all three emotional processing levels, and (3) to acquire and share simultaneously collected physiological, behavioral, and cognitive datasets to improve the predictive power of food choice and other models.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 193 条
  • [1] ADAMS J., 2007, 7 PANGB SENS SCI S M
  • [2] Agarwal S., 2015, Adoption of Innovation: Balancing Internal and External Stakeholders in the Marketing of Innovation, P25, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-14523-5_3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-14523-53]
  • [3] DETERMINATION OF OPTIMAL THERMAL CONDITIONS FOR GROWTH OF CLAM (VENERUPIS-PULLASTRA) SEED
    ALBENTOSA, M
    BEIRAS, R
    CAMACHO, AP
    [J]. AQUACULTURE, 1994, 126 (3-4) : 315 - 328
  • [4] [Anonymous], SENSORY SCI THEORY A
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2012, OUT CONTR P 8 INT C
  • [6] [Anonymous], PSI CHI J PSYCHOL RE
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2015, P ANN M AUSTR SPECIA
  • [8] [Anonymous], IEEE INT C DAT MIN D
  • [9] [Anonymous], LUPC CTR BUS RES LCB
  • [10] [Anonymous], 10 PANGB SENS SCI S