Efficiency of geothermal power plants: A worldwide review

被引:275
|
作者
Zarrouk, Sadiq J. [1 ]
Moon, Hyungsul [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Dept Engn Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Mighty River Power, Rotorua 3040, New Zealand
关键词
Geothermal power plants; Conversion efficiency; Dry steam; Single flash; Double flash; Binary and hybrid plants;
D O I
10.1016/j.geothermics.2013.11.001
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The conversion efficiency of geothermal power developments is generally lower than that of all conventional thermal power plants. Confusion can be found in literature concerning the estimation of this conversion efficiency. Geothermal power plants conversion efficiency estimates that is based on the enthalpy of the produced geothermal fluid can be the most desirable for use during the first estimates of power potential of new wells and for resource estimation studies. The overall conversion efficiency is affected by many parameters including the power plant design (single or double flash, triple flash, dry steam, binary, or hybrid system), size, gas content, dissolved minerals content, parasitic load, ambient conditions and other parameters. This work is a worldwide review using published data from 94 geothermal plants (6 dry-steam, 34 single flash, 18 double flash, 31 binary, 2 hybrid steam-binary and 1 triple flash plant) to find conversion efficiencies based on the reservoir enthalpy. The highest reported conversion efficiency is approximately 21% at the Darajat vapour-dominated system, with a worldwide efficiency average of around 12%. The use of binary plants in low-enthalpy resources has allowed the use of energy from fluid with enthalpy as low as 306 kJ/kg, resulting in a net conversion efficiency of about 1%. A generic geothermal power conversion relation was developed based on the total produced enthalpy. Three more specific correlations are presented for single flash/dry steam plants, double flash plants and binary plants. The conversion efficiency of binary plants has the lowest confidence, mainly because of the common use of air cooling which is highly affected by local and seasonal changes in ambient temperatures. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 153
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comments on "Efficiency of geothermal power plants: A worldwide review" by Sadiq J. Zarrouk and Hyungsul Moon
    DiPippo, Ronald
    GEOTHERMICS, 2015, 53 : 548 - 550
  • [2] Response to the Comments by Ronald DiPippo on "Efficiency of geothermal power plants: A world-wide review"
    Zarrouk, Sadiq J.
    Moon, Hyungsul
    GEOTHERMICS, 2015, 53 : 550 - 553
  • [3] A review of heat recovery applications for solar and geothermal power plants
    DeLovato, Nicolas
    Sundarnath, Kavin
    Cvijovic, Lazar
    Kota, Krishna
    Kuravi, Sarada
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 114
  • [4] Modern geothermal power: Binary cycle geothermal power plants
    Tomarov G.V.
    Shipkov A.A.
    Thermal Engineering, 2017, 64 (4) : 243 - 250
  • [5] The integrative use of binary cycle technology to improve thermal efficiency and efficiency in geothermal power plants: A case study of Ulumbu geothermal power plant in Indonesia
    Prasetyo, Bambang Teguh
    Agustina, Lina
    Suyanto, Suyanto
    Guardi, Arli
    Sutriyanto, Himawan
    Pujowidodo, Hariyotejo
    Harmadi, Rudias
    Cahyadi, Cahyadi
    Ifanda, Ifanda
    Anugia, Zakie
    Mustika, Donny
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 321
  • [6] Physics in geothermal power plants
    Nasrudin, D.
    Nopilawati, D.
    Rochman, C.
    Rahayu, Y. N.
    Millah, M. F.
    Mulhayatiah, D.
    4TH ANNUAL APPLIED SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2019, 2019, 1402
  • [7] Reinjection in geothermal fields: A review of worldwide experience
    Kaya, Eylem
    Zarrouk, Sadiq J.
    O'Sullivan, Michael J.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (01): : 47 - 68
  • [8] Reinjection in geothermal fields A worldwide review update
    Diaz, Alexandre Rivera
    Kaya, Eylem
    Zarrouk, Sadiq J.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 53 : 105 - 162
  • [9] Geothermal wellhead technology power plants in grid electricity generation: A review
    Kabeyi, Moses Jeremiah Barasa
    Olanrewaju, Oludolapo Akanni
    ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2022, 39
  • [10] REVIEW OF GEOTHERMAL AND SOLAR THERMAL POWER PLANTS AND A COMPARATIVE DESIGN ANALYSIS
    Venegas, Roberto
    Kuravi, Sarada
    Kota, Krishna
    Troy Nguyen
    Mccay, Mary
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME POWER CONFERENCE, 2015, 2016,