Psychosocial Trajectories of Men Monitoring Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels Following Surgery for Prostate Cancer

被引:7
作者
Bailey, Donald E., Jr.
Kazer, Meredith Wallace
Polascik, Thomas J.
Robertson, Cary
机构
[1] School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC
[2] School of Nursing, Fairfield University, Connecticut
[3] Division of Urology, School of Medicine, Duke University
关键词
prostate cancer; quality of life; survivorship; coping; NURSES;
D O I
10.1188/14.ONF.361-368
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose/Objectives: To describe the psychosocial trajectories of men treated surgically for prostate cancer after monitoring their prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels until 24 months post-treatment. Design: Descriptive longitudinal study. Setting: Urology clinic at Duke University Health System. Sample: 12 men diagnosed and treated for prostate cancer. Methods: Men were interviewed in their homes at baseline and at 24 months and via telephone at 6, 12, and 18 months. Scores from the Profile of Mood States, Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale, Self-Control Schedule, and Cantril's Ladder were entered into a database for analysis. Graphs of individual participants' scores were plotted. Main Research Variables: PSA values, mood state, cognitive reframing, impact of event, quality of life, illness uncertainty, and growth through uncertainty were measured. Findings: Three trajectories were identified (i.e., stable, unstable, and mixed) and graphed using a typological or health pattern approach. Conclusions: Monitoring PSA levels is critical for men treated for prostate cancer. This study provides preliminary data on the psychological trajectories of men during the first 24 months postprostatectomy. Implications for Nursing: Rising PSA levels that are associated with the recurrence of disease can cause psychosocial distress among men with prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 388
页数:30
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], THE FUTURE OF NURSIN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CROSSING THE QUALITY
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1990, RES LIVED EXPERIENCE
[4]  
Berger A.M., 2009, Oncology Nursing Forum, V36, pE274, DOI DOI 10.1188/09.ONF.E274-E282
[5]   Has the BARRIERS Scale changed nursing practice? An integrative review [J].
Carlson, Cathy L. ;
Plonczynski, Donna J. .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2008, 63 (04) :322-333
[6]  
Creswell J. W, 2007, Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches
[7]   Influence of organizational characteristics and context on research utilization [J].
Cummings, Greta G. ;
Estabrooks, Carole A. ;
Midodzi, William K. ;
Wallin, Lars ;
Hayduk, Leslie .
NURSING RESEARCH, 2007, 56 (04) :S24-S39
[8]   Effectiveness of organisational infrastructures to promote evidence-based nursing practice [J].
Flodgren, Gerd ;
Ximena Rojas-Reyes, Maria ;
Cole, Nick ;
Foxcroft, David R. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (02)
[9]   Factors influencing the development of evidence-based practice: a research tool [J].
Gerrish, Kate ;
Ashworth, Peter ;
Lacey, Anne ;
Bailey, Jeff ;
Cooke, Jo ;
Kendall, Sally ;
McNeilly, Elaine .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2007, 57 (03) :328-338
[10]   Factors Influencing Advanced Practice Nurses' Ability to Promote Evidence-Based Practice among Frontline Nurses [J].
Gerrish, Kate ;
Nolan, Mike ;
McDonnell, Ann ;
Tod, Angela ;
Kirshbaum, Marilyn ;
Guillaume, Louise .
WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING, 2012, 9 (01) :30-39