Pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: Extraperitoneal versus laparoscopic approach

被引:11
作者
Larciprete, G
Casalino, B
Segatore, ME
Jarvis, S
Catarinella, V
Cirese, E
机构
[1] AFaR, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina Hosp, I-00186 Rome, Italy
[2] Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, I-00186 Rome, Italy
[3] Univ London Kings Coll, Guys Kings & St Thomas Sch Med, London WC2R 2LS, England
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY | 2006年 / 126卷 / 02期
关键词
laparoscopic; extraperitoneal; pelvic lymphadenectomy; gynecologic; cancer;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.09.019
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the extraperitoneal versus the laparoscopic technique in performing pelvic lymphadenectomy in a series of patients undergoing a radical vaginal hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer. Study design: Retrospective study with 42 patients undergoing a radical vaginal hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Patients from group A (20 patients) had a laparoscopic lymph node dissection and patients belonging to group B (22 patients) had an extraperitoneal lymphadenectomy. Historical data, clinical and surgical characteristics, perioperative and post-operative complications were analyzed. Follow-up was conducted according to the oncologic requirements. Results: No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of blood loss, post-operative pain, transfusions, hospital stay and post-operative hematomas. The extraperitoneal group (group 13) significantly showed a reduced operating time, a greater number of nodes removed (p < 0.05). The only lymphocyst occurred in group B. Conclusions: Extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy can be considered an adequate technique to complement radical vaginal operations for cervical cancer. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 263
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Establishing a new technique of laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy
    Altgassen, C
    Possover, M
    Krause, N
    Plaul, K
    Michels, W
    Schneider, A
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 95 (03) : 348 - 352
  • [2] Pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy
    Benedetti-Panici, P
    Maneschi, F
    Cutillo, G
    [J]. SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2001, 81 (04) : 841 - +
  • [3] A randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage after lymphadenectomy in gynecologic malignancies
    BenedettiPanici, P
    Maneschi, F
    Cutillo, G
    DAndrea, G
    diPalumbo, VS
    Conte, M
    Scambia, G
    Mancuso, S
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1997, 65 (03) : 478 - 482
  • [4] Intraoperative clinical evaluation of lymph nodes in women with gynecologic cancer
    Eltabbakh, GN
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 184 (06) : 1177 - 1181
  • [5] Hardy J Fr, 2003, Acta Anaesthesiol Belg, V54, P287
  • [6] Evaluation of patients after extraperitoneal lymph node dissection and subsequent radiotherapy for cervical cancer
    Hasenburg, A
    Salama, JK
    Van, TJ
    Amosson, C
    Chiu, JK
    Kieback, DG
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2002, 84 (02) : 321 - 326
  • [7] Correlation between pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with common low back pain
    Kovacs, FM
    Abraira, V
    Zamora, J
    del Real, MTG
    Llobera, J
    Fernández, C
    [J]. SPINE, 2004, 29 (02) : 206 - 210
  • [8] LARSON DM, 1992, OBSTET GYNECOL, V79, P998
  • [9] Early-stage cervical adenocarcinoma treated by surgical intent: The role of para-aortic lymph node dissection
    Lea, JS
    Sheets, EE
    Duska, LR
    Miller, DS
    Schorge, JO
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2002, 84 (02) : 285 - 288
  • [10] Liauw L., 2003, Hong Kong Medical Journal, V9, P108