Ethical Implications of a Critical Legal Case for the Counseling Profession: Ward v. Wilbanks

被引:21
作者
Kaplan, David M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Amer Counseling Assoc, Alexandria, VA 22304 USA
关键词
ethics; law; Ward; Eastern Michigan University; American Counseling Association;
D O I
10.1002/j.1556-6676.2014.00140.x
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This article presents the official position of the American Counseling Association on a seminal legal case for professional counseling: Ward v. Wilbanks. The focus is on three key questions: Is it permissible to deny counseling services to a homosexual client on the basis of a counselor's values? Can referrals be made at any time a counselor wishes to do so? When is a client a client?
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 146
页数:5
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]  
American Counseling Association, 2005, ACA COD ETH
[2]  
American Personnel and Guidance Association, 1961, ETH STAND
[3]  
Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs, 2009, 2009 ACCR MAN
[4]   Legal and ethical implications of refusing to counsel homosexual clients [J].
Hermann, Mary A. ;
Herlihy, Barbara Richter .
JOURNAL OF COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 84 (04) :414-418
[5]  
Stone C., 2005, School counseling principles: Ethics and law
[6]  
Wheeler N., 2008, The counselor and the law: A guide to legal and ethical practice, V5th