Emergy Evaluation of the Natural Value of Water Resources in Chinese Rivers

被引:35
作者
Chen, Dan [1 ]
Chen, Jing [1 ]
Luo, Zhaohui [2 ]
Lv, Zhuwu [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Coll Agr Engn, Nanjing 210098, Peoples R China
[2] Yamanashi Univ, Interdisciplinary Grad Sch Med & Engn, Dept Nat Biot & Social Environm Engn, Kofu, Yamanashi 400, Japan
[3] Yiwu City Water Resources Bur, Yiwu 322000, Peoples R China
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Emergy; Evaluate; Water resources; Value; Rivers; PERSPECTIVES;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-009-9320-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Emergy theory and method were used to evaluate the economy of China and the contributions of water resources in Chinese rivers to the real wealth of the Chinese economy. The water cycle and energy conversion were reviewed, and an emergy method for evaluating the natural value of water resources in a river watershed was developed. The indices for China calculated from the emergy evaluation were close to those of developing countries. Despite a small surplus in its balance of payments, China had a net emergy loss from its trade in 2002. The efficiency of Chinese natural resource use was still not high and did not match its economic growth rate. Furthermore, the Chinese economy placed a stress on its ecological environment and natural resources. Several indices of Chinese rivers from the emergy evaluation were close to those of average global river water. The main average indices of Chinese rivers were transformity (4.17 x 10(4) sej/J), emergy per volume (2.05 x 10(11) sej/m(3)), and emdollar per volume (0.06 $/m(3)). The total value of all the rivers' water made up 13.0% of the GDP of China in 2002, and that of water consumption accounted for 2.1%. The value of the water resources in the Haihe-luanhe River (11.39 x 10(4) sej/J) was the highest, followed by the Yellow River (10.27 x 10(4) sej/J), while the rivers in Southwest China had the lowest values (2.92 x 10(4) sej/J).
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 297
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Abu-Zeid M.A., 1998, WATER POLICY, V1, P9, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S1366-7017(98)00002-6, 10.1016/s1366-7017(98)00002-6]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, INT C WATER ENV DEV, P26
[3]   The transferability of benefit transfer: contingent valuation of water quality improvements in Costa Rica [J].
Barton, DN .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 42 (1-2) :147-164
[4]   Choice modelling: assessing the environmental values of water supply options [J].
Blamey, R ;
Gordon, J ;
Chapman, R .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 1999, 43 (03) :337-357
[5]  
Brandt-Williams S.L., 1999, Evaluation of Watershed Control of Two Central Florida
[6]   EMergy analysis perspectives of Thailand and Mekong river dam proposals [J].
Brown, MT ;
McClanahan, TR .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 1996, 91 (1-3) :105-130
[7]  
Brown MT, 1999, AMBIO, V28, P486
[8]  
Buenfil A.A., 2001, Emergy Evaluation of Water
[9]  
CHEN D, 2005, WATER SAVING IRRIGAT, V5, P2
[10]  
Chen JQ., 2002, WATER RESOURCES SCI