Assessing the impact of health and safety training: Increased behavioral change and organizational performance

被引:6
作者
Ruttenberg, Ruth [1 ,2 ]
Rice, Carol [3 ]
机构
[1] Ruth Ruttenberg & Associates, Northfield, VT USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Sch Management & Labor Relat, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[3] Univ Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH USA
关键词
application of training; HAZWOPER; refresher training; worker training;
D O I
10.1002/ajim.23026
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Annual health and safety refresher training is mandated for workers in a number of employment sectors and also is used to maintain and enhance skills when not legally required. Methods One year following training, hazardous waste worker training participants were asked if the training had been applied at their work or in the community, corresponding to Kirkpatrick levels of training evaluation. Likely response themes were drafted by the authors using qualitative data coding. Results Of the 1,726 refresher participants, 1,094 (63%) provided an entry. Eight theme categories were adapted from the originals, spanning the activities trainees reported as applications of their training: events, actions, awareness, emergency response, equipment, planning and standard operating procedures, training, and use of written resources. Conclusions Asking participants to reflect on how training has been applied provides an opportunity to describe workplace changes made during the past year. Participants documented that training resulted in actions to protect them from hazardous exposures. Specific events where training was used and where actions were taken to improve health and safety represent Kirkpatrick Levels III and IV applications of training. Collecting similar data may be useful to others wishing to identify impacts of training and can be integrated into routine program assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:986 / 995
页数:10
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Branch RM, 2009, INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN: THE ADDIE APPROACH, P1
  • [2] Response rates and responsiveness for surveys, standards, and the Journal
    Fincham, Jack E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2008, 72 (02)
  • [3] Krathwohl D.R., 1964, Handbook 2: Affective domain
  • [4] National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, 2018, MIN HLTH SAF TRAIN C
  • [5] Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), 2018, HAZ WAST OP EM RESP
  • [6] OSHA, SUS HARW EV RES
  • [7] Managers' perceptions of the value and impact of HAZWOPER worker health and safety training
    Riley, Kevin
    Slatin, Craig
    Rice, Carol
    Rosen, Mitchel
    Weidner, B. Louise
    Fleishman, Jane
    Alerding, Linda
    Delp, Linda
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 2015, 58 (07) : 780 - 787
  • [8] A systematic review of the effectiveness of occupational health and safety training
    Robson, Lynda S.
    Stephenson, Carol M.
    Schulte, Paul A.
    Amick, Benjamin C., III
    Irvin, Emma L.
    Eggerth, Donald E.
    Chan, Stella
    Bielecky, Amber R.
    Wang, Anna M.
    Heidotting, Terri L.
    Peters, Robert H.
    Clarke, Judith A.
    Cullen, Kimberley
    Rotunda, Cathy J.
    Grubb, Paula L.
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 2012, 38 (03) : 193 - 208
  • [9] Slatin C, 2017, ENV UNIONS LABOR SUP, DOI [10.4324/9781315232423, DOI 10.4324/9781315232423]