A Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Prediction Model for Prostate Biopsy Risk Stratification

被引:145
作者
Mehralivand, Sherif [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shih, Joanna H. [4 ]
Rais-Bahrami, Soroush [5 ,6 ]
Oto, Aytekin [7 ]
Bednarova, Sandra [8 ,9 ,10 ]
Nix, Jeffrey W. [5 ]
Thomas, John V. [6 ]
Gordetsky, Jennifer B. [11 ]
Gaur, Sonia [1 ]
Harmon, Stephanie A. [12 ]
Siddiqui, Mohummad Minhaj [13 ]
Merino, Maria J. [14 ]
Parnes, Howard L. [15 ]
Wood, Bradford J. [9 ,10 ]
Pinto, Peter A. [3 ]
Choyke, Peter L. [1 ]
Turkbey, Baris [1 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Mol Imaging Program, NIH, 10 Ctr Dr,Mail Stop Code 1182,Bldg 10,Room B3B85, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Urol & Pediat Urol, Mainz, Germany
[3] NCI, Urol Oncol Branch, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] NCI, Div Canc Treatment & Diag, Biometr Res Program, NIH, Rockville, MD USA
[5] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Urol, Birmingham, AL USA
[6] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Radiol, Birmingham, AL USA
[7] Univ Chicago, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[8] Univ Udine, Inst Diagnost Radiol, Dept Med & Biol Sci, Udine, Italy
[9] NCI, Ctr Intervent Oncol, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[10] NIH, Radiol & Imaging Sci Clin Ctr, Bldg 10, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[11] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Pathol, Birmingham, AL USA
[12] Leidos Biomed Res Inc, Clin Res Directorate, Clin Monitoring Res Program, Natl Canc Inst Campus Frederick, Frederick, MD USA
[13] Univ Maryland, Med Ctr, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[14] NCI, Pathol Lab, NIH, Bldg 10, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[15] NCI, Canc Prevent Div, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CANCER RISK; MRI; RECOMMENDATIONS; GUIDELINES; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.5667
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in conjunction with MRI-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion-guided biopsies have improved the detection of prostate cancer. It is unclear whether MRI itself adds additional value to multivariable prediction models based on clinical parameters. OBJECTIVE To determine whether an MRI-based prediction model can reduce unnecessary biopsies in patients with suspected prostate cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Patients underwent MRI, MRI-TRUS fusion-guided biopsy, and 12-core systematic biopsy in 1 session. The development cohort used to derive the prediction model consisted of 400 patients from 1 institution enrolled between May 14, 2015, and August 31, 2016, and the validation cohort included 251 patients from 2 independent institutions who underwent biopsies between April 1, 2013, and June 30, 2016, at 1 institution and between July 1, 2015, and October 31, 2016, at the other institution. The MRI model included MRI-derived parameters in addition to clinical variables. Area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic curves and decision curve analysis were performed. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Risk of clinically significant prostate cancer on biopsy, defined as a Gleason score of 3 + 4 or higher in at least 1 biopsy core. RESULTS Overall, 193 (48.3%) of the 400 patients in the development cohort (mean [SD] age at biopsy, 64.3 [7.1] years) and 96 (38.2%) of the 251 patients in the validation cohort (mean [SD] age at biopsy, 64.9 [7.2] years) had clinically significant prostate cancer, defined as a Gleason score greater than or equal to 3 + 4. By applying the model to the external validation cohort, the area under the curve increased from 64% to 84% compared with the baseline model (P < .001). At a risk threshold of 20%, the MRI model had a lower false-positive rate than the baseline model (46%[95% CI, 32%-66%] vs 92%[95% CI, 70%-100%]), with only a small reduction in the true-positive rate (89% [95% CI, 85%-96%] vs 99%[95% CI, 89%-100%]). Eighteen of 100 fewer biopsies could have been performed, with no increase in the number of patients with missed clinically significant prostate cancers. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The inclusion of MRI-derived parameters in a risk model could reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies while maintaining a high rate of diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancers.
引用
收藏
页码:678 / 685
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study [J].
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater ;
Brown, Louise C. ;
Gabe, Rhian ;
Kaplan, Richard ;
Parmar, Mahesh K. ;
Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda ;
Ward, Katie ;
Hindley, Richard G. ;
Freeman, Alex ;
Kirkham, Alex P. ;
Oldroyd, Robert ;
Parker, Chris ;
Emberton, Mark .
LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) :815-822
[2]   Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): Explanation and Elaboration [J].
Altman, Douglas G. ;
McShane, Lisa M. ;
Sauerbrei, Willi ;
Taube, Sheila E. .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2012, 9 (05)
[3]  
[Anonymous], RISK ASSESSMENT EVAL
[4]   Complications After Systematic, Random, and Image-guided Prostate Biopsy [J].
Borghesi, Marco ;
Ahmed, Hashim ;
Nam, Robert ;
Schaeffer, Edward ;
Schiavina, Riccardo ;
Taneja, Samir ;
Weidner, Wolfgang ;
Loeb, Stacy .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 71 (03) :353-365
[5]   The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System [J].
Epstein, Jonathan I. ;
Egevad, Lars ;
Amin, Mahul B. ;
Delahunt, Brett ;
Srigley, John R. ;
Humphrey, Peter A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (02) :244-252
[6]   Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound (MRI-US) fusion-guided prostate biopsies obtained from axial and sagittal approaches [J].
Hong, Cheng W. ;
Rais-Bahrami, Soroush ;
Walton-Diaz, Annerleim ;
Shakir, Nabeel ;
Su, Daniel ;
George, Arvin K. ;
Merino, Maria J. ;
Turkbey, Baris ;
Choyke, Peter L. ;
Wood, Bradford J. ;
Pinto, Peter A. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 115 (05) :772-779
[7]   A Graphical Device to Represent the Outcomes of a Logistic Regression Analysis [J].
Kranse, Ries ;
Roobol, Monique ;
Schroder, Fritz H. .
PROSTATE, 2008, 68 (15) :1674-1680
[8]   What Is the Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Prostate Cancer at Biopsy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel [J].
Moldovan, Paul C. ;
Van den Broeck, Thomas ;
Sylvester, Richard ;
Marconi, Lorenzo ;
Bellmunt, Joaquim ;
van den Bergh, Roderick C. N. ;
Bolla, Michel ;
Briers, Erik ;
Cumberbatch, Marcus G. ;
Fossati, Nicola ;
Gross, Tobias ;
Henry, Ann M. ;
Joniau, Steven ;
van der Kwast, Theo H. ;
Matveev, Vsevolod B. ;
van der Poel, Henk G. ;
De Santis, Maria ;
Schoots, Ivo G. ;
Wiegel, Thomas ;
Yuan, Cathy Yuhong ;
Cornford, Philip ;
Mottet, Nicolas ;
Lam, Thomas B. ;
Rouviere, Olivier .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 72 (02) :250-266
[9]   Standards of Reporting for MRI-targeted Biopsy Studies (START) of the Prostate: Recommendations from an International Working Group [J].
Moore, Caroline M. ;
Kasivisvanathan, Veeru ;
Eggener, Scott ;
Emberton, Mark ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. ;
Gill, Inderbir S. ;
Grubb, Robert L., III ;
Hadaschik, Boris ;
Klotz, Laurence ;
Margolis, Daniel J. A. ;
Marks, Leonard S. ;
Melamed, Jonathan ;
Oto, Aytekin ;
Palmer, Suzanne L. ;
Pinto, Peter ;
Puech, Philippe ;
Punwani, Shonit ;
Rosenkrantz, Andrew B. ;
Schoots, Ivo G. ;
Simon, Richard ;
Taneja, Samir S. ;
Turkbey, Baris ;
Ukimura, Osamu ;
van der Meulen, Jan ;
Villers, Arnauld ;
Watanabe, Yuji .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 64 (04) :544-552
[10]   EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent [J].
Mottet, Nicolas ;
Bellmunt, Joaquim ;
Bolla, Michel ;
Briers, Erik ;
Cumberbatch, Marcus G. ;
De Santis, Maria ;
Fossati, Nicola ;
Gross, Tobias ;
Henry, Ann M. ;
Joniau, Steven ;
Lam, Thomas B. ;
Mason, Malcolm D. ;
Matveev, Vsevolod B. ;
Moldovan, Paul C. ;
van den Bergh, Roderick C. N. ;
Van den Broeck, Thomas ;
van der Poel, Henk G. ;
van der Kwast, Theo H. ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Schoots, Ivo G. ;
Wiegel, Thomas ;
Cornford, Philip .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 71 (04) :618-629