Weighted sum model with partial preference information: Application to multi-objective optimization

被引:53
作者
Kaddani, Sami [1 ,2 ]
Vanderpooten, Daniel [1 ]
Vanpeperstraete, Jean-Michel [2 ]
Aissi, Hassene [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 09, PSL Res Univ, CNRS, UMR 7243,LAMSADE, F-75016 Paris, France
[2] DCNS Res, 280 Ave Aristide Briand, F-92220 Bagneux, France
关键词
Multiple objective programming; Weighted sum; Partial preference information; LINEAR PARTIAL INFORMATION; POTENTIAL OPTIMALITY; DECISION-MAKING; CRITERIA; DOMINANCE; RANKING; PROBABILITIES; COEFFICIENTS; VALUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2017.01.003
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Multi-objective optimization problems often lead to large nondominated sets, as the size of the problem or the number of objectives increases. Generating the whole nondominated set requires significant computation time, while most of the corresponding solutions are irrelevant to the decision maker (DM). Optimizing an aggregation function reduces the computation time and produces one or a very limited number of more focused solutions. This requires, however, the elicitation of precise preference parameters, which is often difficult and partly arbitrary, and might discard solutions of interest. An intermediate approach consists in using partial preference information with an aggregation function. In this work, we present a preference relation based on the weighted sum aggregation, where weights are not precisely defined. We give some properties of this preference relation and define the set of preferred points as the set of nondominated points with respect to this relation. We provide an efficient and generic way of generating this preferred set using any standard multi-objective optimization algorithm. This approach shows competitive performances both on computation time and quality of the generated preferred set. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:665 / 679
页数:15
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Dominance and potential optimality in multiple criteria decision analysis with imprecise information [J].
Athanassopoulos, AD ;
Podinovski, VV .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1997, 48 (02) :142-150
[2]   The Quickhull algorithm for convex hulls [J].
Barber, CB ;
Dobkin, DP ;
Huhdanpaa, H .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON MATHEMATICAL SOFTWARE, 1996, 22 (04) :469-483
[3]   Decision quality using ranked attribute weights [J].
Barron, FH ;
Barrett, BE .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1996, 42 (11) :1515-1523
[4]  
Bertsimas D., 1997, INTRO LINEAR OPTIMIZ, V6
[5]   Primal-dual methods for vertex and facet enumeration [J].
Bremner, D ;
Fukuda, K ;
Marzetta, A .
DISCRETE & COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY, 1998, 20 (03) :333-357
[6]   MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS WITH PARTIAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE WEIGHTING COEFFICIENTS [J].
CARRIZOSA, E ;
CONDE, E ;
FERNANDEZ, FR ;
PUERTO, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1995, 81 (02) :291-301
[7]   ANALYSIS OF DECISIONS WITH INCOMPLETE KNOWLEDGE OF PROBABILITIES [J].
FISHBURN, PC .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1965, 13 (02) :217-&
[8]  
Gardiner L.R., 1997, MULTICRITERIA ANAL, P290, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-60667-0_28
[9]   Ordinal regression revisited: Multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions [J].
Greco, Salvatore ;
Mousseau, Vincent ;
Slowiniski, Roman .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2008, 191 (02) :416-435
[10]   OBTAINING NONDOMINATED PRIORITY VECTORS FOR MULTIPLE OBJECTIVE DECISION-MAKING PROBLEMS WITH DIFFERENT COMBINATIONS OF CARDINAL AND ORDINAL INFORMATION [J].
HANNAN, EL .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1981, 11 (08) :538-543