Simple method for determining the size of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in children: a prospective observational study

被引:2
作者
Haliloglu, Murat [1 ]
Bilgen, Sevgi [1 ]
Uzture, Neslihan [1 ]
Koner, Ozge [1 ]
机构
[1] Yeditepe Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Reanimat, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA | 2017年 / 67卷 / 01期
关键词
Child; Ear auricle; ProSeal laryngeal mask airway; CONTROLLED VENTILATION; PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS; SELECTION; ANESTHESIA; PRESSURE; INFANTS; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjane.2015.06.004
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and objectives: The size of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in children is determined by the patient's weight. However, in some instances, an alternative method may be required. This study aimed to compare sizing by the auricle with conventional ProSeal laryngeal mask airway sizing by weight in children. Methods: After approval by the institutional ethics board and written informed consent from parents, 197 children with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II who were scheduled for a routine genitourinary operation were included in the study. The correct ProSeal laryngeal mask airway size was determined according to the size of the auricle in children. The results were compared with the standard weight-based method recommended by the manufacturer's guidelines. The patients were classified into different groups depending on the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway sizes as determined by both methods. Agreement between both techniques was evaluated with kappa coefficient statistics. Results: Insertion and adequate ventilation were achieved in 185 patients at the first attempt, and 12 patients required a second attempt. Three patients had to be intubated. Agreement between the two methods of size selection of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway was moderate using kappa statistics. Conclusions: Choosing the size of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in children according to the auricle of the child is valid and practical. In particular, this is an alternative method in situations where the patient's weight is unknown, such as in emergency situations. (C) 2016 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 20
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, LMA PROSEAL TM INSTR
[2]   Laryngeal mask airway and the ASA difficult airway algorithm [J].
Benumof, JL .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 84 (03) :686-699
[3]   An evaluation of the factors influencing selection of the optimal size of laryngeal mask airway in normal adults [J].
Berry, AM ;
Brimacombe, JR ;
McManus, KF ;
Goldblatt, M .
ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 53 (06) :565-570
[4]   The LMA 'ProSeal' - a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent [J].
Brain, AIJ ;
Verghese, C ;
Strube, PJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 84 (05) :650-654
[5]   Optimal intracuff pressures with the laryngeal mask [J].
Brimacombe, J ;
Berry, A ;
Brain, AIJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 77 (02) :295-296
[6]   The ProSea™ laryngeal mask airway:: a review of the literature [J].
Cook, TM ;
Lee, G ;
Nolan, JP .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2005, 52 (07) :739-760
[7]   Randomized crossover comparison of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway with the Laryngeal Tube® during anaesthesia with controlled ventilation [J].
Cook, TM ;
McKinstry, C ;
Hardy, R ;
Twigg, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2003, 91 (05) :678-683
[8]   Simple method to determine the size of the laryngeal mask airway in children [J].
Gallart, L ;
Mases, A ;
Martinez, J ;
Montes, A ;
Fernandez-Galinski, S ;
Puig, MM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 20 (07) :570-574
[9]   The size 11/2 ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in infants:: A randomized, crossover investigation with the Classic™ laryngeal mask airway [J].
Goldmann, K ;
Roettger, C ;
Wulf, H .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2006, 102 (02) :405-410
[10]  
Greig A, 1997, J ACCID EMERG MED, V14, P101