Objective-To assess duration of actions of butorphanol, medetomidine, and a butorphanol-medetomidine combination in dogs given subanesthetic doses of isoflurane (ISO). Animals-6 healthy dogs. Procedure-Minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) Values for ISO were determined, for each dog. Subsequently, 4 treatments were administered to each dog (saline [0.9% NaCl] solution, butorphanol [0.2 mg/kg of body weight], medetomidine [5.0 mu g/kg], and a combination of butorphanol [0.2 mg/kg] and medetomidine [5.0 mu g/kg]). All treatments were administered IM to dogs concurrent with isoflurane; treatment order was determined, using a randomized crossover design. Treatments were given at 7-day intervals. After mask induction with ISO and instrumentation with a rectal temperature probe, end-tidal CO2 and anesthetic gas concentrations were analyzed. End-tidal ISO concentration was reduced to 90% MAC for each dog. A tail clamp was applied 15 minutes later. After a positive response, 1 of the treatments was administered. Response to application of the tail clamp was assessed at 15-minute intervals until a positive response again was detected. Results-Duration of nonresponse after administration of saline solution, butorphanol, medetomidine, and butorphanol-medetomidine (mean +/- SD) was 0.0 +/- 0.0, 1.5 +/- 1.5, 2.63 +/- 0.49, and 5.58 +/- 2.28 hours, respectively. Medetomidine effects were evident significantly longer than those for sa line solution, whereas effects for bulorphanol-medetomidine were evident significantly longer than for each agent administered alone. Conclusion and Clinical Relevance-During ISO-induced anesthesia, administration of medetomidine, but not butorphanol, provides longer and more consistent analgesia than does saline solution, and the combination of butorphanol-medetomidine appears superior to the use of medetomidine or butorphanol alone.