Enhanced CRISPR/Cas9-mediated precise genome editing by improved design and delivery of gRNA, Cas9 nuclease, and donor DNA

被引:179
|
作者
Liang, Xiquan [1 ]
Potter, Jason [1 ]
Kumar, Shantanu [1 ]
Ravinder, Namritha [1 ]
Chesnut, Jonathan D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Thermo Fisher Sci, 5781 Allen Way, Carlsbad, CA 92008 USA
关键词
CRISPR; Cas9; gRNA; Genome editing; Knock-in; Homologous recombination; STEM-CELLS; GENERATION; OLIGODEOXYNUCLEOTIDES; MUTATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.11.011
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
While CRISPR-based gene knock out in mammalian cells has proven to be very efficient, precise insertion of genetic elements via the cellular homology directed repair (HDR) pathway remains a rate-limiting step to seamless genome editing. Under the conditions described here, we achieved up to 56% targeted integration efficiency with up to a six-nucleotide insertion in HEK293 cells. In induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), we achieved precise genome editing rates of up to 45% by co-delivering the Cas9 RNP and donor DNA. In addition, the use of a short double stranded DNA oligonucleotide with 3' overhangs allowed integration of a longer FLAG epitope tag along with a restriction site at rates of up to 50%. We propose a model that favors the design of donor DNAs with the change as close to the cleavage site as possible. For small changes such as SNPs or short insertions, asymmetric single stranded donor molecules with 30 base homology arms 3' to the insertion/repair cassette and greater than 40 bases of homology on the 5' end seems to be favored. For larger insertions such as an epitope tag, a dsDNA donor with protruding 3' homology arms of 30 bases is favored. In both cases, protecting the ends of the donor DNA with phosphorothioate modifications improves the editing efficiency. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 146
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CRISPR/Cas9 and Genome Editing in Drosophila
    Andrew R.Bassett
    Ji-Long Liu
    JournalofGeneticsandGenomics, 2014, 41 (01) : 7 - 19
  • [32] CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in wheat
    Dongjin Kim
    Burcu Alptekin
    Hikmet Budak
    Functional & Integrative Genomics, 2018, 18 : 31 - 41
  • [33] CRISPR/Cas9 and Genome Editing in Drosophila
    Bassett, Andrew R.
    Liu, Ji-Long
    JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND GENOMICS, 2014, 41 (01) : 7 - 19
  • [34] The CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing Revolution
    Jiao, Renjie
    Gao, Caixia
    JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND GENOMICS, 2016, 43 (05) : 227 - 228
  • [35] CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in wheat
    Kim, Dongjin
    Alptekin, Burcu
    Budak, Hikmet
    FUNCTIONAL & INTEGRATIVE GENOMICS, 2018, 18 (01) : 31 - 41
  • [36] CRISPR/Cas9 in Genome Editing and Beyond
    Wang, Haifeng
    La Russa, Marie
    Qi, Lei S.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOCHEMISTRY, VOL 85, 2016, 85 : 227 - 264
  • [37] CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in crops
    Smedley, Mark
    IN VITRO CELLULAR & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY-PLANT, 2018, 54 : S104 - S104
  • [38] CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing in Soybean Hairy Roots
    Cai, Yupeng
    Chen, Li
    Liu, Xiujie
    Sun, Shi
    Wu, Cunxiang
    Jiang, Bingjun
    Han, Tianfu
    Hou, Wensheng
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08):
  • [39] Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in Rehmannia glutinosa
    Xinrong Li
    Xin Zuo
    Mingming Li
    Xu Yang
    Jingyu Zhi
    Hongzheng Sun
    Caixia Xie
    Zhongyi Zhang
    Fengqing Wang
    Plant Cell Reports, 2021, 40 : 1695 - 1707
  • [40] CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing of the Murine Pulmonary Circulation
    Marsboom, Glenn
    Yuan, Yang
    Rehman, Jalees
    Malik, Asrar B.
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2017, 31