Location Restrictions on Smoking: Assessing their Differential Impacts and Consequences in the Workplace

被引:18
作者
Bell, Kirsten [1 ,2 ]
McCullough, Lucy [1 ,3 ]
Devries, Karen [1 ,4 ]
Jategaonkar, Natasha [1 ]
Greaves, Lorraine [1 ]
Richardson, Lindsay [1 ]
机构
[1] BC Ctr Excellence Womens Hlth, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada
[2] Simon Fraser Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London WC1, England
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE | 2009年 / 100卷 / 01期
关键词
Smoking restrictions; secondhand smoke; literature review; diversity; health disparities; tobacco policies; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; TOBACCO POLICIES; WOMEN; BANS; LEGISLATION; POPULATION; CALIFORNIA; BEHAVIOR; EXPOSURE; WORKING;
D O I
10.1007/BF03405492
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: To analyze existing evidence on the impact of two types of location restrictions on smoking: workplace bans and bans in hospitality settings, and to assess the extent to which they differentially affect subpopulations. Methods: A review of international studies on location restrictions on smoking published between 1990-2007. Results: Although workplace smoking bans reduce exposure to second-hand smoke (SHS) at work, their effects on overall cigarette consumption and smoking prevalence may be uneven across the population. Bans in hospitality settings reduce SHS exposure among workers, but have potentially uneven effects based on the interactions between gender, socio-economic status (SES) and ethnicity. The unintended consequences of smoking bans are also more likely to be experienced by low SES groups. Conclusions: Although location restrictions on smoking reduce SHS exposure and may serve to positively impact smoking behaviours, there is preliminary evidence that they may have a reduced impact on subpopulations such as low-income groups, although further research is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 50
页数:5
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
ADDA J, 2006, 509 AUSTR NAT U CTR
[2]   Legislation for smoke-free workplaces and health of bar workers in Ireland: before and after study [J].
Allwright, S ;
Paul, G ;
Greiner, B ;
Mullally, BJ ;
Pursell, L ;
Kelly, A ;
Bonner, B ;
D'Eath, M ;
McConnell, B ;
McLaughlin, JP ;
O'Donovan, D ;
O'Kane, E ;
Perry, IJ .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 331 (7525) :1117-+
[3]  
[Anonymous], PUBLIC HLTH EVIDENCE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, SOC DETERMINANTS HLT
[5]   IMPACT OF A HOSPITAL SMOKING BAN - CHANGES IN TOBACCO USE AND EMPLOYEE ATTITUDES [J].
BAILE, WF ;
GIBERTINI, M ;
ULSCHAK, F ;
SNOWANTLE, S ;
HANN, D .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 1991, 16 (06) :419-426
[6]   Political coalitions and working, women: how the tobacco industry built a relationship with the Coalition of Labor Union Women [J].
Balbach, Edith D. ;
Herzberg, Abby ;
Barbeau, Elizabeth M. .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2006, 60 :27-32
[7]   Tobacco control, stigma, and public health: Rethinking the relations [J].
Bayer, R ;
Stuber, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 96 (01) :47-50
[8]   Do work-place smoking bans cause smokers to smoke ''harder''? Results from a naturalistic observational study [J].
Chapman, S ;
Haddad, S ;
Sindhusake, D .
ADDICTION, 1997, 92 (05) :607-610
[9]  
*DEP HLTH, 2006, PART REG IMP ASS SMO
[10]   The impact of workplace smoking bans: results from a national survey [J].
Farrelly, MC ;
Evans, WN ;
Sfekas, AES .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 1999, 8 (03) :272-277