Non-cardiac comorbidities and mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced vs. preserved ejection fraction: a study using the Swedish Heart Failure Registry

被引:72
|
作者
Ergatoudes, Constantinos [1 ]
Schaufelberger, Maria [1 ]
Andersson, Bert [2 ]
Pivodic, Aldina [3 ]
Dahlstrom, Ulf [4 ]
Fu, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Med, Dept Mol & Clin Med, S-41685 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Cardiol, Sahlgrenska Acad, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Statistiska Konsultgruppen, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Linkoping Univ, Dept Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Cardiol, Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
Heart failure; Comorbidities; Mortality; HFrEF; HFpEF; SYSTOLIC FUNCTION; CO-MORBIDITIES; OUTCOMES; PREVALENCE; IMPACT; EPIDEMIOLOGY; OUTPATIENTS;
D O I
10.1007/s00392-019-01430-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Heart failure (HF) and non-cardiac comorbidities often coexist and are known to have an adverse effect on outcome. However, the prevalence and prognostic impact of non-cardiac comorbidities in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) vs. those with preserved (HFpEF) remain inadequately studied. Methods and results We used data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry from 2000 to 2012. HFrEF was defined as EF < 50% and HFpEF as EF >= 50%. Of 31 344 patients available for analysis, 79.3% (n = 24 856) had HFrEF and 20.7% (n = 6 488) HFpEF. The outcome was all-cause mortality. We examined the association between ten non-cardiac comorbidities and mortality and its interaction with EF using adjusted hazard ratio (HR). Stroke, anemia, gout and cancer had a similar impact on mortality in both phenotypes, whereas diabetes (HR 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.50-1.65] vs. HR 1.39 95% CI [1.27-1.51], p = 0.0002), renal failure (HR 1.65, 95% CI [1.57-1.73] vs. HR 1.44, 95% CI [1.32-1.57], p = 0.003) and liver disease (HR 2.13, 95% CI [1.83-2.47] vs. HR 1.42, 95% CI [1.09-1.85] p = 0.02) had a higher impact in the HFrEF patients. Moreover, pulmonary disease (HR 1.46, 95% CI [1.40-1.53] vs. HR 1.66 95% CI [1.54-1.80], p = 0.007) was more prominent in the HFpEF patients. Sleep apnea was not associated with worse prognosis in either group. No significant variation was found in the impact over the 12-year study period. Conclusions Non-cardiac comorbidities contribute significantly but differently to mortality, both in HFrEF and HFpEF. No significant variation was found in the impact over the 12-year study period. These results emphasize the importance of including the management of comorbidities as a part of a standardized heart failure care in both HF phenotypes.
引用
收藏
页码:1025 / 1033
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Non-cardiac comorbidities and mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced vs. preserved ejection fraction: a study using the Swedish Heart Failure Registry
    Constantinos Ergatoudes
    Maria Schaufelberger
    Bert Andersson
    Aldina Pivodic
    Ulf Dahlström
    Michael Fu
    Clinical Research in Cardiology, 2019, 108 : 1025 - 1033
  • [2] Non-cardiac comorbidities in heart failure with reduced, mid-range and preserved ejection fraction
    Streng, Koen W.
    Nauta, Jan F.
    Hillege, Hans L.
    Anker, Stefan D.
    Cleland, John G.
    Dickstein, Kenneth
    Filippatos, Gerasimos
    Lang, Chim C.
    Metra, Marco
    Ng, Leong L.
    Ponikowski, Piotr
    Samani, Nilesh J.
    van Veldhuisen, Dirk J.
    Zwinderman, Aeilko H.
    Zannad, Faiez
    Damman, Kevin
    van der Meer, Peter
    Voors, Adriaan A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 271 : 132 - 139
  • [3] Prognostic Impact of Comorbidities on Mortality in Patients with Heart failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction vs Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction
    Ather, Sameer
    Chan, Wenyaw
    Bozkurt, Biykem
    Aguilar, David
    Ramasubbu, Kumudha
    Deswal, Anita
    CIRCULATION, 2010, 122 (21)
  • [4] Comorbidities in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
    Deichl, Andrea
    Wachter, Rolf
    Edelmann, Frank
    HERZ, 2022, 47 (04) : 301 - 307
  • [5] Mode of Death in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced vs. Preserved Ejection Fraction - Report From the Registry of Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients
    Hamaguchi, Sanae
    Kinugawa, Shintaro
    Sobirin, Mochamad Ali
    Goto, Daisuke
    Tsuchihashi-Makaya, Miyuki
    Yamada, Satoshi
    Yokoshiki, Hisashi
    Tsutsui, Hiroyuki
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2012, 76 (07) : 1662 - 1669
  • [6] Curative effect analysis of urapidil on heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
    Yuan, Xiao-Ye
    Ding, Cun-Tao
    Li, Jing
    Tan, Jing
    Wang, Yan-Ling
    Fan, Zhen-Xing
    He, Jing-Yu
    Yang, Wei
    Hua, Qi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2019, 12 (01): : 494 - 503
  • [7] Heart Failure with Preserved vs. Reduced Ejection Fraction: Patient Characteristics, In-hospital Treatment and Mortality-DanAHF, a Nationwide Prospective Study
    Lassen, Maria
    Seven, Ekim
    Soholm, Helle
    Hassager, Christian
    Moller, Jacob Eifer
    Kober, Nana Valeur
    Lindholm, Matias Greve
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2024, 17 (02) : 265 - 274
  • [8] Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure With Preserved vs. Reduced Ejection Fraction
    Aro, Aapo
    Reinier, Kyndaron
    Uy-Evanado, Audrey
    Rusinaru, Carmen
    Jui, Jonathan
    Chugh, Sumeet S.
    CIRCULATION, 2017, 136
  • [9] Large Animal Models of Heart Failure: Reduced vs. Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Charles, Christopher J.
    Rademaker, Miriam T.
    Scott, Nicola J. A.
    Richards, A. Mark
    ANIMALS, 2020, 10 (10): : 1 - 12
  • [10] Statins Beneficial for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction But Not Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction?
    Ohte, Nobuyuki
    Little, William C.
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2015, 79 (03) : 508 - 509