A Study on Supply Chain Emission Reduction Level Based on Carbon Tax and Consumers' Low-Carbon Preferences under Stochastic Demand

被引:18
作者
Wang, Liang [1 ]
Xu, Tingjia [1 ]
Qin, Longhao [1 ]
机构
[1] Xian Univ Technol, Sch Econ & Business Adm, Xian 710048, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
IMPACT; CHINA;
D O I
10.1155/2019/1621395
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This article focuses on the level of supply chain emission reduction, taking into account consumers' low-carbon preferences, stochastic market demand, and carbon tax policy. By introducing the emission reduction penalty mechanism and adopting reverse derivation method, it derives the revenue model of the retailer and the manufacturer in decentralized and centralized supply chain when the supply chain reduces emissions or is not under stochastic market demand. The research results are as follows. (i) The optimal retailer's revenue is strictly monotonous increasing with respect to the consumers' low-carbon preferences in the decentralized supply chain. However, in the centralized supply chain, the optimal revenue of the retailer and the manufacturer are strictly monotonously decreasing of the consumers' low-carbon preferences respectively. (ii) The retailer's revenue is a concave function of the order quantity, and there exists a unique order quantity that can maximize retailer's revenue. The manufacturer's revenue is a concave function of the wholesale price, and there exists a unique wholesale price that can maximize manufacturer's revenue. (iii) When consumers' low-carbon preferences are given, there is an optimal emission reduction level that maximizes the overall revenue of the supply chain. Furthermore, as the carbon tax increases, the optimal emission reduction level gradually rises. (iv) As the level of emission reduction in the supply chain increases, the range of the revenue sharing coefficient becomes larger, and it is easier for supply chain members to reach a revenue sharing contract. However, when consumers' low-carbon preferences and carbon tax increase, the opposite is true.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Carbon Footprint and the Management of Supply Chains: Insights From Simple Models [J].
Benjaafar, Saif ;
Li, Yanzhi ;
Daskin, Mark .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2013, 10 (01) :99-116
[2]   Optimal production and carbon emission reduction level under cap-and-trade and low carbon subsidy policies [J].
Cao, Kaiying ;
Xu, Xiaoping ;
Wu, Qiang ;
Zhang, Quanpeng .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 167 :505-513
[3]  
Chen X. X., 2014, ANGEW CHEM INT EDIT, V53, P1, DOI DOI 10.1080/00207543.2014.932928
[4]   Impact of efficiency, investment, and competition on low carbon manufacturing [J].
Chen, Xu ;
Luo, Zheng ;
Wang, Xiaojun .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 143 :388-400
[5]   Exploring China's carbon emissions peak for different carbon tax scenarios [J].
Ding, Suiting ;
Zhang, Ming ;
Song, Yan .
ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 129 :1245-1252
[6]   Technology Choice and Capacity Portfolios under Emissions Regulation [J].
Drake, David F. ;
Kleindorfer, Paul R. ;
Van Wassenhove, Luk N. .
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2016, 25 (06) :1006-1025
[7]   Game-theoretical analysis for supply chain with consumer preference to low carbon [J].
Du, Shaofu ;
Zhu, Jiaang ;
Jiao, Huifang ;
Ye, Wuyi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2015, 53 (12) :3753-3768
[8]   Tactical supply chain planning under a carbon tax policy scheme: A case study [J].
Fahimnia, Behnam ;
Sarkis, Joseph ;
Choudhary, Alok ;
Eshragh, Ali .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2015, 164 :206-215
[9]   Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract [J].
Ghosh, Debabrata ;
Shah, Janat .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2015, 164 :319-329
[10]  
Gros D., 2016, Too late, too sudden: Transition to a lowcarbon economy and systemic risk