Humanizing sociotechnical transitions through energy justice: An ethical framework for global transformative change

被引:217
作者
Jenkins, Kirsten [1 ]
Sovacool, Benjamin K. [2 ,3 ]
McCauley, Darren [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Ctr Innovat & Energy Demand, Jubilee Bldg,Room 348, Falmer BN1 9SL, E Sussex, England
[2] Univ Sussex, Ctr Innovat & Energy Demand, Jubilee Bldg,Room 367, Falmer BN1 9SL, E Sussex, England
[3] Aarhus Univ, Ctr Energy Technol, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Univ St Andrews, Sch Geog & Sustainable Dev, Irvine Bldg,North St, St Andrews KY16 9AL, Fife, Scotland
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Energy justice; Sustainability transitions; Transformative innovation; Multi-level perspective; Energy policy; MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE; SUSTAINABILITY TRANSITIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; INNOVATION SYSTEMS; TEMPORAL DYNAMICS; POLICY; INSIGHTS; POLITICS; DAM; NICHES;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.036
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Poverty, climate change and energy security demand awareness about the interlinkages between energy systems and social justice. Amidst these challenges, energy justice has emerged to conceptualize a world where all individuals, across all areas, have safe, affordable and sustainable energy that is, essentially, socially just. Simultaneously, new social and technological solutions to energy problems continually evolve, and interest in the concept of sociotechnical transitions has grown. However, an element often missing from such transitions frameworks is explicit engagement with energy justice frameworks. Despite the development of an embryonic set of literature around these themes, an obvious research gap has emerged: can energy justice and transitions frameworks be combined? This paper argues that they can. It does so through an exploration of the multi-level perspective on sociotechnical systems and an integration of energy justice at the model's niche, regime and landscape level. It presents the argument that it is within the overarching process of sociotechnical change that issues of energy justice emerge. Here, inattention to social justice issues can cause injustices, whereas attention to them can provide a means to examine and potential resolve them.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 74
页数:9
相关论文
共 165 条
[41]  
Doyle Julie., 2011, The International Communication Gazette, V73, P107, DOI [DOI 10.1177/1748048510386744, https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048510386744]
[42]   The energy transformation as a disruptive development at community level [J].
Duetschke, Elisabeth ;
Wesche, Julius P. .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 37 :251-254
[43]   From wasteland to waste site: the role of discourse in nuclearpower's environmental injustices [J].
Endres, Danielle .
LOCAL ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 14 (10) :917-937
[44]   Historical energy transitions: Speed, prices and system transformation [J].
Fouquet, Roger .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2016, 22 :7-12
[45]   Transition pathways for a UK low carbon electricity future [J].
Foxon, Timothy J. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 52 :10-24
[46]  
Fraser N, 2014, JUSTICE INTERRUPTUS
[47]   Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways [J].
Geels, Frank W. ;
Schot, Johan .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2007, 36 (03) :399-417
[48]   Reducing energy demand through low carbon innovation: A sociotechnical transitions perspective and thirteen research debates [J].
Geels, Frank W. ;
Schwanen, Tim ;
Sorrell, Steve ;
Jenkins, Kirsten ;
Sovacool, Benjamin K. .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 40 :23-35
[49]   Regime Resistance against Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power into the Multi-Level Perspective [J].
Geels, Frank W. .
THEORY CULTURE & SOCIETY, 2014, 31 (05) :21-40
[50]   Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective [J].
Geels, Frank W. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2010, 39 (04) :495-510