Clinical benefit of cetuximab and prognostic value of cetuximab-related skin toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer: a single institution analysis

被引:0
作者
Cvetanovic, Ana [1 ]
Vrbic, Svetislav [1 ,2 ]
Filipovic, Sladjana [1 ,2 ]
Pejcic, Ivica [1 ,2 ]
Milenkovic, Dusan [1 ]
Zivkovic, Nikola [3 ]
Kostic, Milos [4 ]
Petkovici, Ivan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nis, Clin Oncol, Clin Ctr Nis, Nish, Serbia
[2] Univ Nis, Fac Med, Nish, Serbia
[3] Univ Nis, Fac Med, Inst Pathol, Nish, Serbia
[4] Univ Nis, Fac Med, Dept Immunol, Nish, Serbia
来源
JOURNAL OF BUON | 2014年 / 19卷 / 01期
关键词
cetuximab; clinical benefit; metastatic colorectal; cancer; skin toxicity; GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTOR; PLUS IRINOTECAN; 1ST-LINE TREATMENT; PHASE-II; KRAS; OXALIPLATIN; MUTATIONS; SURVIVAL; FLUOROURACIL; CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the clinical benefits of cetuximab (CTX) and the prognostic value of CTX-related skin toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Methods: Sixty patients were tested for KRAS mutation at the Department of Oncology, Clinical Centre Nis. We assessed 34 wild-type KRAS mCRC patients treated with CTX. All of them were refractory to prior fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin and irinotecan-based regimens. The maximum grade skin toxicity according to treatment cycle was analyzed. Skin toxicity was grouped into clinically non-relevant skin toxicity (grade 0-1: Group 1) and clinically relevant skin toxicity (grade 2-4: Group 2). Results: Ten out of 33 patients (30.30%) achieved partial response (PR). Eight additional patients (24.24%) showed stable disease (SD), whereas 15 (45.45%) had disease progression (PD). No patient achieved complete response (CR). Overall response rate (ORR) was 30.30%, whereas the disease control rate (DCR) was 54.54%.The median progression free survival (PFS) was 14 weeks. Some degree of skin toxicity was observed in 79.41% (27/34) of the patients. Clinically non-relevant skin toxicity was observed in 50% (17/34), and clinically relevant in 50 % (17/34) of the patients. Grade 4 skin toxicity was documented in 1 patient. The mean PFS in Group 1 was 12.65 +/- 5.59 weeks and in Group 2 22.82 +/- 12.16 (p < 0.05). The results showed that grade 2-4 skin toxicity was associated with significantly better response to treatment than skin toxicity grade 0-1, with regard to ORR (80.00 vs 20.00%; p < 0.05) and DCR (66.66 vs 33.33%; p < 0.05). Conclusion: Cetuximab has clinical benefit when given alone or in combination with irinotecan in patients with irinotecan-refractory CRC. Skin toxicity was one of the predictors of response and it was in line with what was expected.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 90
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Topical aloe vera for the treatment of cetuximab-related acneiform rash in colorectal cancer: A case report
    Gurbuz, Mustafa
    Akkus, Erman
    Utkan, Guengoer
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2021, 27 (02) : 480 - 484
  • [32] Progress in metastatic colorectal cancer: growing role of cetuximab to optimize clinical outcome
    Garcia-Foncillas, Jesus
    Diaz-Rubio, Eduardo
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 12 (08) : 533 - 542
  • [33] Correlation between efficacy and skin rash occurrence following treatment with the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor cetuximab: A single institution retrospective analysis
    Orditura, Michele
    De Vita, Ferdinando
    Galizia, Gennaro
    Lieto, Eva
    Vecchione, Loredana
    Vitiello, Fabiana
    Martinelli, Erika
    Ciardiello, Fortunato
    ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2009, 21 (04) : 1023 - 1028
  • [34] Primary tumor location predicts poor clinical outcome with cetuximab in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer
    Kim, Dalyong
    Kim, Sun Young
    Lee, Ji Sung
    Hong, Yong Sang
    Kim, Jeong Eun
    Kim, Kyu-pyo
    Kim, Jihun
    Jang, Se Jin
    Yoon, Young-Kwang
    Kim, Tae Won
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 17
  • [35] ACACB is a novel metabolism-related biomarker in the prediction of response to cetuximab therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Hong, Hi-Ju
    Shao, Yanfei
    Zhang, Sen
    Yang, Guang
    Jia, Hongtao
    Yang, Xiao
    Huang, Ling
    Li, Shuchun
    Aikemu, Batuer
    Zhang, Luyang
    Ma, Junjun
    Zang, Lu
    Sun, Jing
    Zheng, Minhua
    ACTA BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA SINICA, 2022, 54 (11) : 1671 - 1683
  • [36] Exploratory biomarker analysis for treatment response in KRAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer patients who received cetuximab plus irinotecan
    Kim, Seung Tae
    Ahn, Tae Jin
    Lee, Eunjin
    Do, In-Gu
    Lee, Su Jin
    Park, Se Hoon
    Park, Joon Oh
    Park, Young Suk
    Lim, Ho Yeong
    Kang, Won Ki
    Kim, Suk Hyeong
    Lee, Jeeyun
    Kim, Hee Cheol
    BMC CANCER, 2015, 15
  • [37] Identification and prognostic analysis of the cetuximab resistance-related gene REV1 in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer
    Zhu, Ning
    Fang, Xuefeng
    Li, Dan
    Yang, Mengyuan
    Zhu, Lizhen
    Zhong, Liping
    Weng, Shanshan
    Wang, Juan
    Yuan, Ying
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 11 (06): : 2769 - 2781
  • [38] Different Toxicity of Cetuximab and Panitumumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Petrelli, Fausto
    Ardito, Raffaele
    Ghidini, Antonio
    Zaniboni, Alberto
    Ghidini, Michele
    Barni, Sandro
    Tomasello, Gianluca
    ONCOLOGY, 2018, 94 (04) : 191 - 199
  • [39] RAS testing and cetuximab treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis in a setting with limited health resources
    Wu, Bin
    Yao, Yuan
    Zhang, Ke
    Ma, Xuezhen
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (41) : 71164 - 71172
  • [40] Skin rash during cetuximab treatment in advanced colorectal cancer: Is age a clinical predictor?
    Giuliani J.
    Marzola M.
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer, 2013, 44 (2) : 241 - 245