Clinical benefit of cetuximab and prognostic value of cetuximab-related skin toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer: a single institution analysis

被引:0
作者
Cvetanovic, Ana [1 ]
Vrbic, Svetislav [1 ,2 ]
Filipovic, Sladjana [1 ,2 ]
Pejcic, Ivica [1 ,2 ]
Milenkovic, Dusan [1 ]
Zivkovic, Nikola [3 ]
Kostic, Milos [4 ]
Petkovici, Ivan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nis, Clin Oncol, Clin Ctr Nis, Nish, Serbia
[2] Univ Nis, Fac Med, Nish, Serbia
[3] Univ Nis, Fac Med, Inst Pathol, Nish, Serbia
[4] Univ Nis, Fac Med, Dept Immunol, Nish, Serbia
来源
JOURNAL OF BUON | 2014年 / 19卷 / 01期
关键词
cetuximab; clinical benefit; metastatic colorectal; cancer; skin toxicity; GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTOR; PLUS IRINOTECAN; 1ST-LINE TREATMENT; PHASE-II; KRAS; OXALIPLATIN; MUTATIONS; SURVIVAL; FLUOROURACIL; CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the clinical benefits of cetuximab (CTX) and the prognostic value of CTX-related skin toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Methods: Sixty patients were tested for KRAS mutation at the Department of Oncology, Clinical Centre Nis. We assessed 34 wild-type KRAS mCRC patients treated with CTX. All of them were refractory to prior fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin and irinotecan-based regimens. The maximum grade skin toxicity according to treatment cycle was analyzed. Skin toxicity was grouped into clinically non-relevant skin toxicity (grade 0-1: Group 1) and clinically relevant skin toxicity (grade 2-4: Group 2). Results: Ten out of 33 patients (30.30%) achieved partial response (PR). Eight additional patients (24.24%) showed stable disease (SD), whereas 15 (45.45%) had disease progression (PD). No patient achieved complete response (CR). Overall response rate (ORR) was 30.30%, whereas the disease control rate (DCR) was 54.54%.The median progression free survival (PFS) was 14 weeks. Some degree of skin toxicity was observed in 79.41% (27/34) of the patients. Clinically non-relevant skin toxicity was observed in 50% (17/34), and clinically relevant in 50 % (17/34) of the patients. Grade 4 skin toxicity was documented in 1 patient. The mean PFS in Group 1 was 12.65 +/- 5.59 weeks and in Group 2 22.82 +/- 12.16 (p < 0.05). The results showed that grade 2-4 skin toxicity was associated with significantly better response to treatment than skin toxicity grade 0-1, with regard to ORR (80.00 vs 20.00%; p < 0.05) and DCR (66.66 vs 33.33%; p < 0.05). Conclusion: Cetuximab has clinical benefit when given alone or in combination with irinotecan in patients with irinotecan-refractory CRC. Skin toxicity was one of the predictors of response and it was in line with what was expected.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 90
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cetuximab in third-line therapy of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A single institution experience
    Pantelic, Aleksandra
    Markovic, Milan
    Pavlovic, Milan
    Jancic, Snezana
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2016, 21 (01): : 70 - 79
  • [2] Assessment of Skin-related Toxicity in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Cetuximab
    Pacek, Agnieszka
    Koziol, Magdalena
    Pueskuellueoglu, Miroslawa
    Tomaszewski, Krzysztof A.
    Ochenduszko, Sebastian
    Zygulska, Aneta L.
    Krzemieniecki, Krzysztof
    ACTA DERMATOVENEROLOGICA CROATICA, 2014, 22 (02) : 137 - 144
  • [3] Prognostic value of cetuximab-related skin toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer patients and its correlation with parameters of the epidermal growth factor receptor signal transduction pathway: Results from a randomized trial of the GERMAN AIO CRC Study Group
    Stintzing, Sebastian
    Kapaun, Christine
    Laubender, Ruediger Paul
    Jung, Andreas
    Neumann, Jens
    Modest, Dominik Paul
    Giessen, Clemens
    Moosmann, Nicolas
    Wollenberg, Andreas
    Kirchner, Thomas
    Heinemann, Volker
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 132 (01) : 236 - 245
  • [4] The Riddle of Cetuximab-Related Skin Toxicity: 1H-NMR Sebum Analysis Revealed Dynamic Lipid Alterations Associated with Skin Toxicity Development in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients
    Saorin, Asia
    Di Gregorio, Emanuela
    Buonadonna, Angela
    Miolo, Gianmaria
    Corona, Giuseppe
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (21)
  • [5] Predictive and prognostic value of KRAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab: A meta-analysis of 22 studies
    Qiu, Li-Xin
    Mao, Chen
    Zhang, Jian
    Zhu, Xiao-Dong
    Liao, Ru-Yan
    Xue, Kai
    Li, Jin
    Chen, Qing
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 46 (15) : 2781 - 2787
  • [6] Comparison Between Biweekly and Weekly Cetuximab in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis
    Matsuda, Akihisa
    Yamada, Takeshi
    Jamjittrong, Supaschin
    Shinji, Seiichi
    Ohta, Ryo
    Sonoda, Hiromichi
    Kamonvarapitak, Tunyaporn
    Sekiguchi, Kumiko
    Miyashita, Masao
    Suzuki, Hideyuki
    Yoshida, Hiroshi
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 40 (06) : 3469 - 3476
  • [7] Efficacy and toxicity of adding cetuximab to chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis from 12 randomized controlled trials
    Lv, Zhong-chuan
    Ning, Jin-yao
    Chen, Hong-bing
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2014, 35 (12) : 11741 - 11750
  • [8] Cetuximab-based therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of the effect of K-ras mutations
    Ibrahim, Ezzeldin M.
    Zekri, Jamal M.
    Bin Sadiq, Bakr M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2010, 25 (06) : 713 - 721
  • [9] Skin toxicity evaluation in patients treated with cetuximab for metastatic colorectal cancer: a new tool for more accurate comprehension of quality of life impacts
    De Tursi, Michele
    Zilli, Marinella
    Carella, Consiglia
    Auriemma, Matteo
    Lisco, Maria Nadia
    Di Nicola, Marta
    Di Martino, Iuseppe
    Natoli, Clara
    Amerio, Paolo
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2017, 10 : 3007 - 3014
  • [10] Addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy as first-line treatment for KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: Pooled analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS randomised clinical trials
    Bokemeyer, Carsten
    Van Cutsem, Eric
    Rougier, Philippe
    Ciardiello, Fortunato
    Heeger, Steffen
    Schlichting, Michael
    Celik, Ilhan
    Koehne, Claus-Henning
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 (10) : 1466 - 1475