Comparison of bioimpedance spectroscopy and the Watson formula for measuring body volume in patients on peritoneal dialysis

被引:2
作者
Martinez Fernandez, Gonzalo [1 ]
Ortega Cerrato, Agustin [1 ]
de la Vara Iniesta, Lourdes [1 ]
Oliver Galera, Eva [2 ]
Gomez Roldan, Carmen [1 ]
Perez Martinez, Juan [1 ]
机构
[1] Complejo Hosp & Univ Albacete, Serv Nefrol, Albacete, Spain
[2] Complejo Hosp Univ Albacete, Serv Med Interna, Galera, Albacete, Spain
来源
NEFROLOGIA | 2016年 / 36卷 / 01期
关键词
Peritoneal dialysis; Bioimpedance spectroscopy; Watson formula; Total body volume; NUTRITIONAL-STATUS; WATER; PREDICTOR; IMPEDANCE; HYDRATION; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.nefro.2015.11.002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Knowing total body volume (V) is crucial in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD). It is usually calculated by the Watson anthropometric formula, although the use of bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is becoming increasingly widespread. Measuring V with both methods can at times produce quite different results. Objective: We aimed to identify differences between the 2 forms of measuring volume in a PD unit and determine which clinical factors are associated with these differences. Methods: Ours is an observational study of 74 patients on PD. We measured V using BIS (Vbis) and the Watson formula (Vw); 271 measurements were made with each method. We calculated the difference between Vbis and Vw in each patient and classified them into 2 groups: Difference between volumes >= 10% or <10% Vbis. We assessed the presence of several clinical parameters in our patients. We assessed whether there were any differences between Vbis and Vw (Student t-test). We determined whether there was any association between the difference in volumes and the presence of the clinical parameters analysed (chi square test). Results: V was 2.151 higher measured by the Watson formula than with BIS (P<.01). In 58.67% of the measurements, the difference between Vbis and Vw was >= 10%. Significant differences were found when comparing the presence of difference between volumes and the presence or not of diabetes mellitus (DM) (p=0,03), hypertension (HTN) (p=0,036), hypoalbuminemia (p<0,01), hypoprealbuminemia (p<0,01), low phase angle at 50 Hz (p<0,01), high C reactive protein (p<0,01), obesity (p=0,027), E/I ratio (ratio between extracellular and intracellular water) >= 1 (p<0.01) and residual diuresis (p=0.029). Conclusions: There are significant differences in the V of PD Unit patients when obtained by Watson formula or by BIS. A difference between the measurements is associated with the presence of DM, HTN, hypoalbuminaemia, obesity, malnutrition, inflammation, E/I ratio >= 1 and the absence of residual diuresis. (C) 2015 Sociedad Espanola de Nefrologia. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 62
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   The phase angle of the electrical impedance is a predictor of long-term survival in dialysis patients [J].
Abad, S. ;
Sotomayor, G. ;
Vega, A. ;
Perez de Jose, A. ;
Verdalles, U. ;
Jofre, R. ;
Lopez-Gomez, J. M. .
NEFROLOGIA, 2011, 31 (06) :670-676
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Am J Kidney Dis, V30, pS67
[3]  
Arkouche W, 1997, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V8, P1906
[4]  
Arrieta J, 2006, Nefrologia, V26 Suppl 4, P1
[5]   Total body water in health and disease: Have anthropometric equations any meaning? [J].
Basile, Carlo ;
Vernaglione, Luigi ;
Bellizzi, Vincenzo ;
Lomonte, Carlo ;
Rubino, Anna ;
D'Ambrosio, Nicola ;
Di Iorio, Biagio .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 23 (06) :1997-2002
[6]   Hydration status assessment by multi-frequency bioimpedance in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease [J].
Caravaca, F. ;
Martinez del Viejo, C. ;
Villa, J. ;
Martinez Gallardo, R. ;
Ferreira, F. .
NEFROLOGIA, 2011, 31 (05) :537-544
[7]   Extracellular water/intracellular water is a strong predictor of patient survival in incident peritoneal dialysis patients [J].
Chen, Wei ;
Guo, Li-Juan ;
Wang, Tao .
BLOOD PURIFICATION, 2007, 25 (03) :260-266
[8]   Strong association between volume status and nutritional status in peritoneal dialysis patients [J].
Cheng, LT ;
Tang, W ;
Wang, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2005, 45 (05) :891-902
[9]   Comparing different methods of assessing body composition in end-stage renal failure [J].
Cooper, BA ;
Aslani, A ;
Ryan, M ;
Zhu, FYP ;
Ibels, LS ;
Allen, BJ ;
Pollock, CA .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 58 (01) :408-416
[10]  
Crepaldi C, 2009, CONTRIB NEPHROL, V163, P1, DOI 10.1159/000223772