Risk Factors for Missed Dynamic Canal Stenosis in the Cervical Spine

被引:37
|
作者
Hayashi, Tetsuo [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Jeffrey C. [1 ]
Suzuki, Akinobu [1 ]
Takahashi, Shinji [1 ]
Scott, Trevor P. [1 ]
Phan, Kevin [1 ]
Lord, Elizabeth L. [1 ]
Ruangchainikom, Monchai [1 ]
Shiba, Keiichiro [2 ]
Daubs, Michael D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Santa Monica, CA 90404 USA
[2] Japan Labour Hlth & Welf Org, Spinal Injuries Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Fukuoka, Japan
关键词
spinal canal stenosis; cervical spine; magnetic resonance imaging; spinal cord compression; kinematics; instability; distribution; disc degeneration; motion; missed diagnosis; impingement; SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY; DISC DEGENERATION; FLEXION; SYSTEM; CORD; UNIT;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000000289
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Retrospective analysis of kinematic magnetic resonance (MR) images. Objective. To elucidate the distribution and risk factors associated with missed dynamic stenosis in cervical spine. Summary of Background Data. Motion of the cervical spine is widely accepted to be associated with cervical spondylotic myelopathy; however, the distribution and the risk factors for dynamic spinal stenosis are not well understood. Methods. A total of 435 symptomatic patients (2610 cervical segments) obtained upright kinematic MR images in neutral, flexion, and extension postures. Spinal cord compression (SCC), spondylolisthesis, disc bulging, angular motion, translational motion, disc degeneration grade, Modic changes, segmental alignment, and developmental stenosis were all evaluated. Cervical segments C2-C3 to C7-T1 were divided into 2 groups, determined by the presence of SCC. After excluding segments with SCC in the neutral position, a multivariate logistic regression model was used to evaluate for associated risk factors of SCC in flexion and extension that were not present in the neutral position. Results. SCC in neutral position was observed in 5.3% (139/2610) of segments. After excluding these segments, missed dynamic stenosis was found in 8.3% (204/2471) of segments in extension and 1.6% (40/2471) in flexion. Missed dynamic stenosis in both extension and flexion was most frequent at C5-C6. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for dynamic stenosis in extension revealed that disc bulge greater than 2.4 mm, angular motion greater than 4.8 degrees, moderate and severe disc degeneration, segmental kyphosis, and developmental stenosis were significant risk factors. In flexion, significant risk factors were a disc bulge of 1.9 mm or greater, moderate to severe disc degeneration, and segmental kyphosis. Conclusion. Dynamic cord compression was most common at the C5-C6 segment. Cervical segments with greater disc bulge, more severe disc degeneration, greater angular motion, segmental kyphosis, and developmental stenosis may be at risk for missed dynamic stenosis.
引用
收藏
页码:812 / 819
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Study of Cobb Angular Velocity in Cervical Spine during Dynamic Extension-Flexion
    Ren, Dong
    Hu, Zhihao
    Yuan, Wen
    SPINE, 2016, 41 (07) : E410 - E415
  • [22] A quantitative and reproducible method to assess cord compression and canal stenosis after cervical spine trauma - A study of interrater and intrarater reliability
    Furlan, Julio C.
    Fehlings, Michael G.
    Massicotte, Eric M.
    Aarabi, Bizhan
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Bono, Christopher M.
    Madrazo, Ignacio
    Villanueva, Carlos
    Grauer, Jonathan N.
    Mikulis, David
    SPINE, 2007, 32 (19) : 2083 - 2091
  • [23] Physical characteristics of patients with developmental cervical spinal canal stenosis
    Kasai, Yuichi
    Akeda, Koji
    Uchida, Atsumasa
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2007, 16 (07) : 901 - 903
  • [24] Physical characteristics of patients with developmental cervical spinal canal stenosis
    Yuichi Kasai
    Koji Akeda
    Atsumasa Uchida
    European Spine Journal, 2007, 16 : 901 - 903
  • [25] Analysis of Morphometric Parameters in Cervical Canal Stenosis on Neutral and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Tykocki, Tomasz
    du Plessis, Johannes
    Wynne-Jones, Guy
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 114 : E317 - E322
  • [26] Traumatic cervical spine injuries: characteristics of missed injuries
    Rana, Ankur R.
    Drongowski, Robert
    Breckner, Gretchen
    Ehrlich, Peter F.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2009, 44 (01) : 151 - 155
  • [27] Missed cervical spine injuries A NATIONAL SURVEY OF THE PRACTICE OF EVALUATION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE IN CONFUSED AND COMATOSE PATIENTS
    Craxford, S.
    Bayley, E.
    Walsh, M.
    Clamp, J.
    Boszczyk, B. M.
    Stokes, O. M.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2016, 98B (06) : 825 - 828
  • [28] Risk Factors for Reintubation After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery
    Tanaka, Atsushi
    Onishi, Eijiro
    Hashimura, Takumi
    Ota, Satoshi
    Takeuchi, Hisataka
    Tsukamoto, Yoshihiro
    Yamashita, Shinnosuke
    Mitsuzawa, Sadaki
    Yasuda, Tadashi
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2024, 37 (05): : 203 - 209
  • [29] Risk factors for vertebral artery injuries in cervical spine trauma
    Harshavardhana, Nanjundappa S.
    Dabke, Harshad V.
    ORTHOPEDIC REVIEWS, 2014, 6 (03) : 128 - 130
  • [30] Operated family cases of cervical canal stenosis
    Matsushima, T
    Yaoita, H
    Nagano, T
    Watanabe, K
    DEVELOPMENTS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 2004, 1259 : 465 - 469