The accuracy of presepsin for the diagnosis of sepsis from SIRS: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:46
|
作者
Zheng, Zhongjun
Jiang, Libing
Ye, Ligang
Gao, Yuzhi
Tang, Luping
Zhang, Mao [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Affiliated Hosp 2, Sch Med, Hangzhou 310009, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
来源
ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE | 2015年 / 5卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Sepsis; SIRS; Presepsin; sCD14-ST; SOLUBLE CD14 SUBTYPE; DISSEMINATED INTRAVASCULAR COAGULATION; INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE SYNDROME; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; SEPTIC SHOCK; BACTERIAL-INFECTION; SCD14-ST PRESEPSIN; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; UNITED-STATES; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1186/s13613-015-0089-1
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Sepsis is a common condition that has a high mortality and morbidity that need prompt diagnosis and treatment. Biomarkers like Soluble CD14 subtype (sCD14-ST, presepsin) may be useful in identifying patients with sepsis and its diagnostic superiority has been confirmed by several preliminary studies. The aim of this study was systematically and quantitatively to evaluate the value of presepsin for the diagnosis of sepsis through the method of meta-analysis. Methods: Four major databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Web of Knowledge, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception to March 2015. Two investigators conducted the processes of literature search, study selection, data extraction, and quality evaluation independently. And the original data were extracted from all eligible individual studies to construct two-by-two tables. Results: A total of eight studies comprising 1757 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.77 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.75-0.80), 0.73 (95 % CI 0.69-0.77), and 14.25 (95 % CI 8.66-23.42), respectively. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) area under the curve (AUC) was 0.8598. The subgroup analysis based on excluding the outliers showed that the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.85 (95 % CI 0.81-0.89) and 0.65 (95 % CI 0.59-0.70), respectively. The AUC was 0.8213 with no significant heterogeneity. Conclusions: Presepsin has moderate diagnostic capacity for the detection of sepsis. Further research of presepsin is needed before widespread use in emergency department. And presepsin in combination with other laboratory biomarkers in diagnosing sepsis may be the focus of future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The accuracy of presepsin for the diagnosis of sepsis from SIRS: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhongjun Zheng
    Libing Jiang
    Ligang Ye
    Yuzhi Gao
    Luping Tang
    Mao Zhang
    Annals of Intensive Care, 5
  • [2] Accuracy of Presepsin in Sepsis Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wu, Jiayuan
    Hu, Liren
    Zhang, Gaohua
    Wu, Fenping
    He, Taiping
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (07):
  • [3] Comparison of diagnostic accuracy in sepsis between presepsin, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Chin-Chieh
    Lan, Hao-Min
    Han, Shih-Tsung
    Chaou, Chung-Hsien
    Yeh, Chun-Fu
    Liu, Su-Hsun
    Li, Chih-Huang
    Blaney, Gerald N., III
    Liu, Zhen-Ying
    Chen, Kuan-Fu
    ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2017, 7
  • [4] Comparison of presepsin and Mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin in the diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liang, Jun
    Cai, Yingli
    Shao, Yiming
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [5] Accuracy of presepsin in neonatal sepsis: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Parri, Niccolo
    Trippella, Giulia
    Lisi, Catiuscia
    De Martino, Maurizio
    Galli, Luisa
    Chiappini, Elena
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY, 2019, 17 (04) : 223 - 232
  • [6] Presepsin as a diagnostic marker for sepsis: evidence from a bivariate meta-analysis
    Tong, Xiaomeng
    Cao, Yongtong
    Yu, Min
    Han, Chengwu
    THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2015, 11 : 1027 - 1033
  • [7] Accuracy of serum interleukin (IL)-6 in sepsis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hou, Tieying
    Huang, Dehong
    Zeng, Rong
    Ye, Zhiming
    Zhang, Yu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (09): : 15238 - 15245
  • [8] SIRS, SOFA, qSOFA, and NEWS in the diagnosis of sepsis and prediction of adverse outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qiu, Xia
    Lei, Yu-Peng
    Zhou, Rui-Xi
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY, 2023, 21 (08) : 891 - 900
  • [9] Accuracy of circulating microRNAs in diagnosis of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiaomin Shen
    Jiajie Zhang
    Yicheng Huang
    Jiepeng Tong
    Li Zhang
    Zhijuan Zhang
    Wei Yu
    Yunqing Qiu
    Journal of Intensive Care, 8
  • [10] Accuracy of circulating microRNAs in diagnosis of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shen, Xiaomin
    Zhang, Jiajie
    Huang, Yicheng
    Tong, Jiepeng
    Zhang, Li
    Zhang, Zhijuan
    Yu, Wei
    Qiu, Yunqing
    JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2020, 8 (01)