The impact of city-level permitting processes on residential photovoltaic installation prices and development times: An empirical analysis of solar systems in California cities

被引:38
作者
Dong, Changgui [1 ,2 ]
Wiser, Ryan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Elect Markets & Policy Grp, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, LBJ Sch Publ Affairs, Austin, TX 78713 USA
关键词
Photovoltaic; Permitting; Installed prices; LEARNING-CURVE; COST; TECHNOLOGIES; POWER; ELECTRICITY; PROSPECTS; POLICY; MODEL; PV;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.054
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
With "soft" costs accounting for well over 50% of the installed price of residential photovoltaic (PV) systems in the United States, this study evaluates the effect of city-level permitting processes on the installed price of residential PV systems and on the time required to develop those systems. The study uses a unique dataset from the U.S. Department of Energy's Rooftop Solar Challenge Program, which includes city-level permitting process "scores," plus data from the California Solar Initiative and the U.S. Census. Econometric methods are used to quantify the price and development-time effects of city-level permitting processes on more than 3000 PV installations across 44 California cities in 2011. Results suggest that cities with the most favorable permitting practices can reduce average residential PV prices by $0.27-$0.77/W (4-12% of median PV prices in California) compared with cities with the most onerous permitting practices, depending on the regression model used. Though the empirical models for development times are less robust, results suggest that the most streamlined permitting practices may shorten development times by around 24 days on average (25% of the median development time). These findings illustrate the potential price and development-time benefits of streamlining local permitting procedures for PV systems. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 542
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, RESIDENTIAL COMMERCI
[2]  
[Anonymous], IMP LOC PERM COST SO
[3]  
Ardani K., 2012, BENCHMARKING NONHARD
[4]  
Barbose G., 2012, TRACKING SUN 5 INSTA
[5]   Re-considering the economics of photovoltaic power [J].
Bazilian, Morgan ;
Onyeji, Ijeoma ;
Liebreich, Michael ;
MacGill, Ian ;
Chase, Jennifer ;
Shah, Jigar ;
Gielen, Dolf ;
Arent, Doug ;
Landfear, Doug ;
Shi Zhengrong .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2013, 53 :329-338
[6]   A review of solar photovoltaic levelized cost of electricity [J].
Branker, K. ;
Pathak, M. J. M. ;
Pearce, J. M. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (09) :4470-4482
[7]  
Brooks B., 2012, EXPEDITED PERMIT PRO
[8]   Assumptions and the levelized cost of energy for photovoltaics [J].
Darling, Seth B. ;
You, Fengqi ;
Veselka, Thomas ;
Velosa, Alfonso .
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2011, 4 (09) :3133-3139
[9]   Learning experience for thin-film solar modules: First Solar, Inc. case study [J].
Green, Martin A. .
PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS, 2011, 19 (04) :498-500
[10]   Analytical model for solar PV and CSP electricity costs: Present LCOE values and their future evolution [J].
Hernandez-Moro, J. ;
Martinez-Duart, J. M. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 20 :119-132