Synchronized Nasal Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation and Neonatal Outcomes

被引:63
|
作者
Bhandari, Vineet [1 ]
Finer, Neil N. [5 ]
Ehrenkranz, Richard A.
Saha, Shampa [6 ]
Das, Abhik [6 ]
Walsh, Michele C. [4 ]
Engle, William A. [3 ]
Van Meurs, Krisa P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Div Perinatal Med, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Lucile Packard Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Riley Hosp Children, Dept Pediat, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
[4] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Pediat, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Pediat, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[6] Res Triangle Inst, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
premature newborn; respiratory distress syndrome; noninvasive ventilation; CYSTIC PERIVENTRICULAR LEUKOMALACIA; RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS-SYNDROME; BIRTH-WEIGHT INFANTS; AIRWAY PRESSURE; BRONCHOPULMONARY DYSPLASIA; PREMATURE-INFANTS; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; MANDATORY VENTILATION; HYPOCAPNIA; EXTUBATION;
D O I
10.1542/peds.2008-1302
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Synchronized nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) use reduces reintubation rates compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP). Limited information is available on the outcomes of infants managed with SNIPPV. OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcomes of infants managed with SNIPPV (postextubation or for apnea) to infants not treated with SNIPPV at 2 sites. METHODS: Clinical retrospective data was used to evaluate the use of SNIPPV in infants <= 1250 g birth weight (BW); and 3 BW subgroups (500-750, 751-1000, and 1001-1250 g, decided a priori). SNIPPV was not assigned randomly. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) was defined as treatment with supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age. RESULTS: Overall, infants who were treated with SNIPPV had significantly lower mean BW (863 vs 964 g) and gestational age (26.4 vs 27.9 weeks), more frequently received surfactant (85% vs 68%), and had a higher incidence of BPD or death (39% vs 27%) (all P < .01) compared with infants treated with NCPAP. In the subgroup analysis, SNIPPV was associated with lower rates of BPD (43% vs 67%; P = .03) and BPD/death (51% vs 76%; P = .02) in the 500- to 750-g infants, with no significant differences in the other BW groups. Logistic regression analysis, adjusting for significant covariates, revealed infants with 500-700-g BW who received SNIPPV were significantly less likely to have the outcomes of BPD (OR: 0.29 [95% CI: 0.11-0.77]; P = .01), BPD/death (OR: 0.30 [95% CI: 0.11-0.79]; P = .01), neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) (OR: 0.29 [95% CI: 0.09-0.94]; P = .04), and NDI/death (OR: 0.18 [95% CI: 0.05-0.62]; P = .006). CONCLUSION: SNIPPV use in infants at greatest risk of BPD or death (500-750 g) was associated with decreased BPD, BPD/death, NDI, and NDI/death when compared with infants managed with NCPAP. Pediatrics 2009; 124: 517-526
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 526
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Synchronized Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation
    Moretti, Corrado
    Gizzi, Camilla
    CLINICS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2021, 48 (04) : 745 - 759
  • [2] Effect of introduction of synchronized nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation in a neonatal intensive care unit on bronchopulmonary dysplasia and growth in preterm infants
    Kulkarni, A
    Ehrenkranz, RA
    Bhandari, V
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2006, 23 (04) : 233 - 240
  • [3] Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation for Preterm Neonates: Synchronized or Not?
    Waitz, Markus
    Mense, Lars
    Kirpalani, Haresh
    Lemyre, Brigitte
    CLINICS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2016, 43 (04) : 799 - +
  • [4] Questions Concerning Nasal Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation vs Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
    Wang, Li
    Shi, Yuan
    JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2013, 167 (09) : 872 - 873
  • [5] NASAL INTERMITTENT POSITIVE-PRESSURE VENTILATION IN WEANING INTUBATED PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC RESPIRATORY-DISEASE FROM ASSISTED INTERMITTENT, POSITIVE-PRESSURE VENTILATION
    RESTRICK, LJ
    SCOTT, AD
    WARD, EM
    FENECK, RO
    CORNWELL, WE
    WEDZICHA, JA
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 1993, 87 (03) : 199 - 204
  • [6] Questions Concerning Nasal Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation vs Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Reply
    Meneses, Jucille
    Bhandari, Vineet
    Alves, Joao Guilherme
    JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2013, 167 (09) : 873 - 873
  • [7] NASAL INTERMITTENT POSITIVE-PRESSURE VENTILATION OFFERS NO ADVANTAGES OVER NASAL CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE IN APNEA OF PREMATURITY
    RYAN, CA
    FINER, NN
    PETERS, KL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF CHILDREN, 1989, 143 (10): : 1196 - 1198
  • [8] A randomized controlled trial of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in RDS
    Bhandari, V.
    Gavino, R. G.
    Nedrelow, J. H.
    Pallela, P.
    Salvador, A.
    Ehrenkranz, R. A.
    Brodsky, N. L.
    JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2007, 27 (11) : 697 - 703
  • [9] A randomized controlled trial of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in RDS
    V Bhandari
    R G Gavino
    J H Nedrelow
    P Pallela
    A Salvador
    R A Ehrenkranz
    N L Brodsky
    Journal of Perinatology, 2007, 27 : 697 - 703
  • [10] Improved ventilation in piglets treated with nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation.
    Lampland, AL
    Meyers, PA
    Worwa, CT
    Swanson, EC
    Mammel, MC
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2006, 54 (01) : S98 - S98