Survey of catalysts for oxidation of mercury in flue gas

被引:495
作者
Presto, Albert A. [1 ]
Granite, Evan J. [1 ]
机构
[1] US DOE, Natl Energy Technol Lab, Pittsburgh, PA 15236 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/es060504i
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Methods for removing mercury from flue gas have received increased attention because of recent limitations placed on mercury emissions from coal-fired utility boilers by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and various states. A promising method for mercury removal is catalytic oxidation of elemental mercury (Hg-0) to oxidized mercury (Hg2+), followed by wet flue gas desulfurization (FGD). FGD cannot remove Hg-0, but easily removes Hg2+ because of its solubility in water. To date, research has focused on three broad catalyst areas: selective catalytic reduction catalysts, carbon-based materials, and metals and metal oxides. We review published results for each type of catalyst and also present a discussion on the possible reaction mechanisms in each case. One of the major sources of uncertainty in understanding catalytic mercury oxidation is a lack of knowledge of the reaction mechanisms and kinetics. Thus, we propose that future research in this area should focus on two major aspects: determining the reaction mechanism and kinetics and searching for more cost-effective catalyst and support materials.
引用
收藏
页码:5601 / 5609
页数:9
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]  
AMRHEIN GT, 1999, ADV EMISSIONS CONTRO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, MERCURY STUDY REPORT
[3]   CHEMISTRY OF PHOSGENE [J].
BABAD, H ;
ZEILER, AG .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 1973, 73 (01) :75-91
[4]   SCR catalyst performance in flue gases derived from subbituminous and lignite coals [J].
Benson, SA ;
Laumb, JD ;
Crocker, CR ;
Pavlish, JH .
FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 86 (05) :577-613
[5]  
Blythe G, 2000, ENHANCED CONTROL MER
[6]  
Blythe G., 2001, ENHANCED CONTROL MER
[7]  
Blythe G., 2003, PILOT TESTING MERCUR
[8]  
BOCK J, 2003, P DOE EPRI USEPA AWM
[9]   Comparison of heating losses and macro thermogravimetric analysis procedures for estimating unburned carbon in combustion residues [J].
Burris, SC ;
Li, D ;
Riley, JT .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2005, 19 (04) :1493-1502
[10]  
BUTZ J, 2000, P 17 PITTSB COAL C