Bioeconomy imaginaries: A review of forest-related social science literature

被引:39
作者
Holmgren, Sara [1 ]
D'Amato, Dalia [2 ]
Giurca, Alexandru [3 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Urban & Rural Dev, Ulls Vag 27, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Univ Helsinki, Fac Agr & Forestry, Helsinki Inst Sustainabil Sci, Dept Forest Sci, Latokartanonkaari 7,POB 27, Helsinki 00014, Finland
[3] Univ Freiburg, Fac Environm & Nat Resources, Chair Forest & Environm Policy, Tennenbacherstr 4, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
基金
芬兰科学院; 瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Circular bioeconomy; Equity; Forest-based bioeconomy; Knowledge-based economy; Sustainable transformation; Sustainability transitions; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; BIO-BASED ECONOMY; POLITICAL-ECONOMY; CIRCULAR ECONOMY; SUSTAINABILITY; GREEN; TRANSFORMATION; GOVERNANCE; TRANSITION; SECTOR;
D O I
10.1007/s13280-020-01398-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This review article examines how social science literature co-produces various imaginaries of forest-based bioeconomy transformations and pathways for reaching desired ends. Based on an analysis of 59 research articles, we find that despite a growing number of social sciences studies on the forest-based bioeconomy, much of the research tends to replicate a bioeconomy imaginary articulated in EU and national bioeconomy policies and strategies. Accordingly, the research primarily reproduces a weak approach to sustainability, which prioritize economic growth and competitiveness. Expectations are largely directed at national and regional corporate interests and forest industrial renewal, while the state has a supportive rather than restricting role. We discuss the findings against the role of social sciences, and conclude that social science scholars may adopt various strategies if interested in opening up forest-based policy debates and offer alternative imaginaries of sustainable bioeconomy transformations.
引用
收藏
页码:1860 / 1877
页数:18
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]   Contradictions of Spatial Governance: Bioeconomy and the Management of State Space in FinlandAvainsanat [J].
Ahlqvist, Toni ;
Sirvio, Heikki .
ANTIPODE, 2019, 51 (02) :395-418
[2]  
Andersson J, 2019, BATTLE FUTURE ROLE R
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, AMBIO, DOI [10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y, DOI 10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Innovating for Sustainable Growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe
[5]   Competitive Bioeconomy? Comparing Bio-based and Non-bio-based Primary Sectors of the World [J].
Asada, Raphael ;
Stern, Tobias .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 149 :120-128
[6]  
BENNICH T, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI DOI 10.3390/su10040976
[7]   Theorizing the Bioeconomy: Biovalue, Biocapital, Bioeconomics or ... What? [J].
Birch, Kean ;
Tyfield, David .
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2013, 38 (03) :299-327
[8]   Biorefinery strategies: exploring approaches to developing forest-based biorefinery activities in British Columbia and Ontario, Canada [J].
Blair, M. Jean ;
Cabral, Laura ;
Mabee, Warren E. .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2017, 29 (05) :528-541
[9]   Reviewing natural resources law in the light of bioeconomy: Finnish forest regulations as a case study [J].
Borgstrom, Suvi .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2018, 88 :11-23
[10]   Monitoring the progress towards bioeconomy using multi-regional input-output analysis: The example of wood use in Germany [J].
Budzinski, Mails ;
Bezama, Alberto ;
Thraen, Daniela .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 161 :1-11