Optimizing prostate cancer accumulating model: combined PI-RADS v2 with prostate specific antigen and its derivative data

被引:8
作者
Lu, Yuan-Fei [1 ]
Zhang, Qian [1 ]
Yao, Wei-Gen [2 ]
Chen, Hai-Yan [1 ]
Chen, Jie-Yu [1 ]
Xu, Cong-Cong [3 ]
Yu, Ri-Sheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, 88 Jie Fang Rd, Hangzhou 310009, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Ningbo Univ, Yangming Affiliated Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Yuyao 315400, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
来源
CANCER IMAGING | 2019年 / 19卷
关键词
Prostate cancer; MRI; Prostate-specific antigen; Model; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; GLEASON SCORE; FREE-PSA; DENSITY; BIOPSY; MEN; GUIDELINES; ACCURACY; MRI;
D O I
10.1186/s40644-019-0208-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundTo establish a new accumulating model to enhance the accuracy of prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis by incorporating prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and its derivative data into the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2).MethodsA total of 357 patients who underwent prostate biopsy between January 2014 and December 2017 were included in this study. All patients had 3.0T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and complete laboratory examinations. PI-RADS v2 was used to assess the imaging. PSA, PSA density (PSAD), the free/total PSA ratio (f/t PSA) and the Gleason score (GS) were classified into four-tiered levels, and optimal weights were pursued on these managed levels to build a PCa accumulating model. A receiver operating characteristic curve was generated.ResultsIn all, 174 patients (48.7%) had benign prostatic hyperplasia, and 183 (51.3%) had PCa, among whom 149 (81.4%, 149/183) had clinically significant PCa. The established model 6 (PI-RADS v2+level of PSAD + level of f/t PSA+ level of PSA) had a sensitivity and specificity of 81.4 and 84.5%, respectively, at the cut-off point of 11 in PCa diagnosis. Correspondingly, at the 12 cut-off point, the sensitivity and specificity were 87.7 and 83.0%, respectively, in diagnosing clinically significant PCa. The score of the new accumulating system was significantly different among the defined GS groups (p<0.001). The mean values and 95% confidence intervals for GS 1-4 groups were 10.20 (9.63-10.40), 12.03 (11.19-12.87), 14.12 (13.60-14.64) and 15.44 (15.09-15.79).ConclusionsA new PCa accumulating model may be useful in improving the accuracy of the primary diagnosis of PCa and helpful in the clinical decision to perform a biopsy when MRI results are negative.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Patterns of Repeat Prostate Biopsy in Contemporary Clinical Practice [J].
Abraham, Nitya E. ;
Mendhiratta, Neil ;
Taneja, Samir S. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04) :1178-1184
[2]   Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study [J].
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater ;
Brown, Louise C. ;
Gabe, Rhian ;
Kaplan, Richard ;
Parmar, Mahesh K. ;
Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda ;
Ward, Katie ;
Hindley, Richard G. ;
Freeman, Alex ;
Kirkham, Alex P. ;
Oldroyd, Robert ;
Parker, Chris ;
Emberton, Mark .
LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) :815-822
[3]   Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer [J].
Alberts, Arnout R. ;
Roobol, Monique J. ;
Drost, Frank-Jan H. ;
van Leenders, Geert J. ;
Bokhorst, Leonard P. ;
Bangma, Chris H. ;
Schoots, Ivo G. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 120 (04) :511-519
[4]   Characterizing indeterminate (Likert-score 3/5) peripheral zone prostate lesions with PSA density, PI-RADS scoring and qualitative descriptors on multiparametric MRI [J].
Appayya, Mrishta Brizmohun ;
Sidhu, Harbir S. ;
Dikaios, Nikolaos ;
Johnston, Edward W. ;
Simons, Lucy A. M. ;
Freeman, Alex ;
Kirkham, Alexander P. S. ;
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Punwani, Shonit .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 91 (1083)
[5]   Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 Guidelines for Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Recommendations for Use [J].
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Weinreb, Jeffrey C. ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Thoeny, Harriet C. ;
Tempany, Clare M. ;
Shtern, Faina ;
Padhani, Anwar R. ;
Margolis, Daniel ;
Macura, Katarzyna J. ;
Haider, Masoom A. ;
Cornud, Francois ;
Choyke, Peter L. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) :41-49
[6]   Long-term Distress After Radical Prostatectomy Versus Watchful Waiting in Prostate Cancer: A Longitudinal Study from the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-4 Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Bill-Axelson, Anna ;
Garmo, Hans ;
Holmberg, Lars ;
Johansson, Jan-Erik ;
Adami, Hans-Olov ;
Steineck, Gunnar ;
Johansson, Eva ;
Rider, Jennifer R. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 64 (06) :920-928
[7]   Comparison of percent free PSA, PSA density, and age-specific PSA cutoffs for prostate cancer detection and staging [J].
Catalona, WJ ;
Southwick, PC ;
Slawin, KM ;
Partin, AW ;
Brawer, MK ;
Flanigan, RC ;
Patel, A ;
Richie, JP ;
Walsh, PC ;
Scardino, PT ;
Lange, PH ;
Gasior, GH ;
Loveland, KG ;
Bray, KR .
UROLOGY, 2000, 56 (02) :255-260
[8]   Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Review of the Evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force [J].
Chou, Roger ;
Croswell, Jennifer M. ;
Dana, Tracy ;
Bougatsos, Christina ;
Blazina, Ian ;
Fu, Rongwei ;
Gleitsmann, Ken ;
Koenig, Helen C. ;
Lam, Clarence ;
Maltz, Ashley ;
Rugge, J. Bruin ;
Lin, Kenneth .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 155 (11) :762-U94
[9]   Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Whittington, R ;
Malkowicz, SB ;
Schultz, D ;
Blank, K ;
Broderick, GA ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Renshaw, AA ;
Kaplan, I ;
Beard, CJ ;
Wein, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11) :969-974
[10]   Accuracy of Multiparametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection: A Meta-Analysis [J].
de Rooij, Maarten ;
Hamoen, Esther H. J. ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Rovers, Maroeska M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 202 (02) :343-351