Eco-efficiency guiding micro-level actions towards sustainability: Ten basic steps for analysis

被引:71
作者
Huppes, Gjalt [1 ]
Ishikawa, Masanobu [2 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, CML, Dept Ind Ecol, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Econ, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
关键词
Technology assessment; Scale effects; LCA; Integrated assessment; Scenarios; INPUT-OUTPUT; IPAT; FRAMEWORK; IMPACT; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.01.007
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This paper looks at the compatibility between technological improvements at the micro-level and sustainability at the macro-level. The two main approaches to prevent environmental degradation are technological improvement and economic degrowth. How do we establish the sustainability of technological options? LCA-type analysis of the technology system, combined with economic cost analysis, offers a first integrated eco-efficiency score. However, such a technology analysis focuses on micro-level technology relations only, is usually too optimistic and ignores other constraints implied in a choice. Fitting more comprehensive knowledge into the sustainability evaluation of options requires a unifying systematic framework, which is worked out in the present paper as a ten-step procedure. The integrative framework for empirical analysis is ultimately a comparative-static systems analysis at macro-level, not in a deterministic dynamic mode, which is impossible, but as a knowledge-fed scenario analysis. The analysis shows the change in society's overall eco-efficiency, combining total value creation with total environmental impacts. Possible domains of application include not only technology choices like those in eco-innovation, including changed consumption styles and volumes, but also changes in policies regarding technologies and markets, whether direct policy shifts or indirect changes through institutional adaptations. Ultimately, such a framework also allows culturally framed questions about the type of society we would like to live in. to be analysed in terms of their economic and environmental consequences. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1687 / 1700
页数:14
相关论文
共 76 条
[41]  
Huppes G, 2007, QUANTIFIED ECOEFFICI
[42]   Sustainability evaluation: Diverging routes recombined? [J].
Huppes, Gjalt ;
Ishikawa, Masanobu .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 62 (01) :199-200
[43]  
ISHIKAWA M, 2006, MICROMACRO LINK ECOE
[44]  
KLEIJN RL, MAT CONSTRAINT UNPUB
[45]   Conference and workshop on modelling global land use implications in the environmental assessment of biofuels [J].
Kloverpris, Jesper ;
Wenzel, Henrik ;
Banse, Martin ;
Mila I Canals, Llorenc ;
Reenberg, Anette .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2008, 13 (03) :178-183
[46]  
KOPP R, 1999, DISCOUNTING INTERGEN
[47]   The practice of IS/IT benefits management in large Australian organizations [J].
Lin, C ;
Pervan, G .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2003, 41 (01) :13-24
[48]  
Luhmann N., 1984, Social Systems, VTrans.
[49]  
Ed. 1995 ed.
[50]  
LUO L, 2008, RENEWABLE S IN PRESS