Neural differences between monolinguals and early bilinguals in their native language during comprehension

被引:21
作者
Roman, P. [1 ,2 ]
Gonzalez, J. [1 ]
Ventura-Campos, N. [1 ]
Rodriguez-Pujadas, A. [1 ]
Sanjuan, A. [1 ,3 ]
Avila, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jaume 1, Dept Basic & Clin Psychol & Psychobiol, Castellon de La Plana 12701, Spain
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Psychol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] UCL, Wellcome Trust Ctr Neuroimaging, London WC1N 3BG, England
关键词
Bilingualism; Sentence comprehension; Native language processing; fMRI; SIGN-LANGUAGE; PROFICIENT BILINGUALS; CRITICAL PERIOD; PHONOLOGICAL REPRESENTATIONS; INTERLINGUAL HOMOPHONES; SENTENCE COMPREHENSION; VISUAL-CORTEX; BRAIN; 2ND-LANGUAGE; ACQUISITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.bandl.2015.07.011
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Research has shown that semantic processing of sentences engages more activity in the bilingual compared to the monolingual brain and, more specifically, in the inferior frontal gyrus. The present study aims to extend those results and examines whether semantic and also grammatical sentence processing involve different cerebral structures when testing in the native language. In this regard, highly proficient Spanish/Catalan bilinguals and Spanish monolinguals made grammatical and semantic judgments in Spanish while being scanned. Results showed that both types of judgments recruited more cerebral activity for bilinguals in language-related areas including the superior and middle temporal gyri. Such neural differences co-occurred with similar performance at the behavioral level. Taken together, these data suggest that early bilingualism shapes the brain and cognitive processes in sentence comprehension even in their native language; on the other hand, they indicate that brain over activation in bilinguals is not constrained to a specific area. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 89
页数:10
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Neural aspects of second language representation and language control [J].
Abutalebi, Jubin .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2008, 128 (03) :466-478
[2]  
Ashby F. Gregory, 2011, Statistical Analysis of fMRI Data
[3]  
Berken J. A., 2014, 44 ANN M SOC NEUR WA
[4]  
Bialystok Ellen, 2009, Psychol Sci Public Interest, V10, P89, DOI 10.1177/1529100610387084
[5]   Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual children [J].
Bialystok, Ellen ;
Luk, Gigi ;
Peets, Kathleen F. ;
Yang, Sujin .
BILINGUALISM-LANGUAGE AND COGNITION, 2010, 13 (04) :525-531
[6]   Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent [J].
Bialystok, Ellen .
BILINGUALISM-LANGUAGE AND COGNITION, 2009, 12 (01) :3-11
[7]   Are phonological representations in bilinguals language specific? An ERP study on interlingual homophones [J].
Carrasco-Ortiz, Haydee ;
Midgley, Katherine J. ;
Frenck-Mestre, Cheryl .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 49 (04) :531-543
[8]   How native-like is non-native language processing? [J].
Clahsen, Harald ;
Felser, Claudia .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2006, 10 (12) :564-570
[9]  
Clark E. V., 2009, First Language Acquisition, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511806698
[10]   How does bilingualism improve executive control? A comparison of active and reactive inhibition mechanisms [J].
Colzato, Lorenza S. ;
Bajo, Maria Teresa ;
van den Wildenberg, Wery ;
Paolieri, Daniela ;
Nieuwenhuis, Sander ;
La Heij, Wido ;
Hommel, Bernhard .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2008, 34 (02) :302-312