Comparison of right and left laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy

被引:34
作者
Kay, Mark D. [1 ]
Brook, Nicholas [1 ]
Kaushik, Monika [1 ]
Harper, Simon J. F. [1 ]
Bagul, Atul [1 ]
Nicholson, Michael L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Leicester, Leicester, Leics, England
关键词
laparoscopic donor nephrectomy; side; function; complications;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06429.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To compare the anatomy and function of right and left kidneys retrieved by laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LDN). PATIENTS AND METHODS In all, 84 transperitoneal LDNs were performed, 66 left and 18 right. Two different right-sided LDN techniques were used: initially, the inferior vena cava (IVC) was controlled with a Satinsky clamp introduced through a 6-8 cm right upper quadrant incision, through which the kidney was also removed (six patients). Subsequently, the IVC was completely mobilized by laparoscopic retrocaval dissection (in 12 patients), allowing the use of a linear stapler-cutter, including the caval ostium with the renal vein. The kidney was then removed through a short Pfannenstiel incision. RESULTS Left kidneys had longer renal veins (38 vs 27 mm; P < 0.05), but there were no differences in arterial length (32 vs 31 mm). Three right kidneys required back-table renal vein lengthening. The operative duration was shorter for right-sided LDNs (132 vs 182 min; P < 0.05). The serum creatinine level at 3 months was 131 vs 134 mmol/L for right and left kidneys, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Despite faster surgery suggesting that the right LDN is technically easier, there is a greater need for back-table reconstruction of the renal vein. The functional results of right and left kidneys are equivalent.
引用
收藏
页码:843 / 844
页数:2
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Technique, indications and outcomes of pure laparoscopic right donor nephrectomy [J].
Abrahams, HM ;
Freise, CE ;
Kang, SM ;
Stoller, ML ;
Meng, MV .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (05) :1793-1796
[2]   Laparoscopic right nephrectomy for live kidney donation: functional results [J].
Bettschart, V ;
Boubaker, A ;
Martinet, O ;
Golshayan, D ;
Wauters, JP ;
Mosimann, F .
TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 16 (06) :419-424
[3]   Are concerns over right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy unwarranted? [J].
Buell, JF ;
Edye, M ;
Johnson, M ;
Li, C ;
Koffron, A ;
Cho, E ;
Kuo, P ;
Johnson, L ;
Hanaway, M ;
Potter, SR ;
Bruce, DS ;
Cronin, DC ;
Newell, KA ;
Leventhal, J ;
Jacobs, S ;
Woodle, ES ;
Bartlett, ST ;
Flowers, JL .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2001, 233 (05) :645-650
[4]   Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy [J].
Flowers, JL ;
Jacobs, S ;
Cho, E ;
Morton, A ;
Rosenberger, WF ;
Evans, D ;
Imbembo, AL ;
Bartlett, ST .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1997, 226 (04) :483-489
[5]   Right-sided laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy: Is reluctance still justified? [J].
Lind, MY ;
Hazebroek, EJ ;
Hop, WCJ ;
Weimar, W ;
Bonjer, HJ ;
Ijzermans, JNM .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 74 (07) :1045-1047
[6]   Should the indications for laparascopic live donor nephrectomy of the right kidney be the same as for the open procedure? Anomalous left renal vasculature is not a contraindication to laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy [J].
Mandal, AK ;
Cohen, C ;
Montgomery, RA ;
Kavoussi, LR ;
Ratner, LE .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 71 (05) :660-664
[7]   The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: A systematic review [J].
Merlin, TL ;
Scott, DF ;
Rao, MM ;
Wall, DR ;
Francis, DMA ;
Bridgewater, FHG ;
Maddern, GJ .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 70 (12) :1659-1666
[8]   Laparoscopic versus open living-donor nephrectomy: Experiences from a prospective, randomized, single-center study focusing on donor safety [J].
Oyen, O ;
Andersen, M ;
Mathisen, L ;
Kvarstein, G ;
Edwin, B ;
Line, PD ;
Scholz, T ;
Pfeffer, PF .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 79 (09) :1236-1240
[9]  
RATNER LE, 1995, TRANSPLANTATION, V60, P1047
[10]   Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial [J].
Simforoosh, N ;
Basiri, A ;
Tabibi, A ;
Shakhssalim, N ;
Moghaddam, SMMH .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 95 (06) :851-855