Low-Cost Avoidance Behaviors are Resistant to Fear Extinction in Humans

被引:123
作者
Vervliet, Bram [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Indekeu, Ellen [4 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Univ Leuven KU Leuven, Ctr Excellence Generalizat Hlth & Psychopathol, Leuven, Belgium
[4] Univ Leuven KU Leuven, Dept Psychol, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
fear; extinction; avoidance; response prevention; exposure; SAFETY BEHAVIOR; MODEL; RELAPSE; ANXIETY; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00351
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Elevated levels of fear and avoidance are core symptoms across the anxiety disorders. It has long been known that fear serves to motivate avoidance. Consequently, fear extinction has been the primary focus in pre-clinical anxiety research for decades, under the implicit assumption that removing the motivator of avoidance (fear) would automatically mitigate the avoidance behaviors as well. Although this assumption has intuitive appeal, it has received little scientific scrutiny. The scarce evidence from animal studies is mixed, while the assumption remains untested in humans. The current study applied an avoidance conditioning protocol in humans to investigate the effects of fear extinction on the persistence of low-cost avoidance. Online danger-safety ratings and skin conductance responses documented the dynamics of conditioned fear across avoidance and extinction phases. Anxiety- and avoidance-related questionnaires explored individual differences in rates of avoidance. Participants first learned to click a button during a predictive danger signal, in order to cancel an upcoming aversive electrical shock (avoidance conditioning). Next, fear extinction was induced by presenting the signal in the absence of shocks while button-clicks were prevented (by removing the button in Experiment 1, or by instructing not to click the button in Experiment 2). Most importantly, post extinction availability of the button caused a significant return of avoidant button-clicks. In addition, trait-anxiety levels correlated positively with rates of avoidance during a predictive safety signal, and with the rate of pre- to post-extinction decrease during this signal. Fear measures gradually decreased during avoidance conditioning, as participants learned that button clicks effectively canceled the shock. Preventing button-clicks elicited a sharp increase in fear, which subsequently extinguished. Fear remained low during avoidance testing, but danger-safety ratings increased again when button-clicks were subsequently prevented. Together, these results show that low-cost avoidance behaviors can persist following fear extinction and induce increased threat appraisal. On the other hand, fear extinction did reduce augmented rates of unnecessary avoidance during safety in trait-anxious individuals, and instruction-based response prevention was more effective than removal of response cues. More research is needed to characterize the conditions under which fear extinction might mitigate avoidance.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596
[2]   Context, ambiguity, and unlearning: Sources of relapse after behavioral extinction [J].
Bouton, ME .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 52 (10) :976-986
[3]   Persistent active avoidance correlates with activity in prelimbic cortex and ventral striatum [J].
Bravo-Rivera, Christian ;
Roman-Ortiz, Ciorana ;
Montesinos-Cartagena, Marlian ;
Quirk, Gregory J. .
FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 9
[4]  
Craske M. G., 2006, Fear and learning: From basic processes to clinical implications, P217, DOI DOI 10.1037/11474-011
[5]  
de Bruin G.O., 2006, Netherlands Journal of Psychology, V62, P87, DOI [10.1007/BF03061055, DOI 10.1007/BF03061055]
[6]   The Effects of Safety Behavior Directed Towards a Safety Cue on Perceptions of Threat [J].
Engelhard, Iris M. ;
van Uijen, Sophie L. ;
van Seters, Niels ;
Velu, Nicolette .
BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 2015, 46 (05) :604-610
[7]   WHY DO PEOPLE WORRY [J].
FREESTON, MH ;
RHEAUME, J ;
LETARTE, H ;
DUGAS, MJ ;
LADOUCEUR, R .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1994, 17 (06) :791-802
[8]   Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes [J].
Hayes, SC ;
Luoma, JB ;
Bond, FW ;
Masuda, A ;
Lillis, J .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2006, 44 (01) :1-25
[9]   Avoidance learning: a review of theoretical models and recent developments [J].
Krypotos, Angelos-Miltiadis ;
Effting, Marieke ;
Kindt, Merel ;
Beckers, Tom .
FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 9
[10]   Neuroticism and avoidance of ambiguous stimuli: Better safe than sorry? [J].
Lommen, Miriam J. J. ;
Engelhard, Iris M. ;
van den Hout, Marcel A. .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2010, 49 (08) :1001-1006