SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF CHEVRON-BRACED STEEL FRAMES BASED ON PREVENTING BUCKLING INSTABILITY OF BRACES

被引:7
作者
Dicleli, Murat [1 ]
Mehta, Anshu [2 ]
机构
[1] Middle E Tech Univ, Dept Engn Sci, TR-06531 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Bradley Univ, Dept Civil Engn & Construct, Peoria, IL 61625 USA
关键词
Buckling; damage index; earthquake; frame; retrofitting; steel bracing; DAMAGE MODEL; LINK BEAMS; DESIGN; BEHAVIOR; PERFORMANCE; STRATEGIES; EARTHQUAKE; BRIDGES; RISE;
D O I
10.1142/S0219455409003053
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In this research, a seismic retrofitting method for chevron-braced frames (CBFs) is proposed. The key idea here is to prevent the buckling of the chevron braces via a conventional construction technique that involves a hysteretic energy-dissipating element installed between the braces and the connected beam. The energy-dissipating element is designed to yield prior to buckling of the braces, thereby preventing the lateral stiffness and strength degradation of the CBF caused by buckling, while effectively dissipating the earthquake input energy. Nonlinear static pushover, time history and damage analyses of the CBF and retrofitted CBF (RCBF) are conducted to assess the performance of the RCBF compared with that of the CBF. The results of the analyses reveal that the proposed retrofitting method can efficiently alleviate the detrimental effects of earthquakes on the CBF. The RCBF has a more stable lateral force-deformation behavior with enhanced energy dissipation capability than the CBF. For small-to-moderate intensity ground motions, the maximum interstory drift of the RCBF is close to that of the CBF. But, for high intensity ground motions, it is considerably smaller than that of the CBF. Compared with the CBF under medium-to-large intensity ground motions, the RCBF experiences significantly less damage due to prevention of buckling of the braces.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 356
页数:24
相关论文
共 34 条
[11]   Effect of isolator and ground motion characteristics on the performance of seismic-isolated bridges [J].
Dicleli, M ;
Buddaram, S .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2006, 35 (02) :233-250
[12]   Simulation of inelastic cyclic buckling behavior of steel box sections [J].
Dicleli, Murat ;
Mehta, Anshu .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2007, 85 (7-8) :446-457
[13]  
Dua R., 2004, Int J Struct Stab Dyn, V4, P197, DOI [10.1142/S0219455404001197, DOI 10.1142/S0219455404001197]
[14]  
*FED EM MAN AG, 2001, NEHRP REC PROV DEV S
[15]  
Gwozdz M., 1997, Arch. Civ. Eng, V43, P37
[16]  
Hindi R.A., 2001, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V17, P261, DOI [DOI 10.1193/1.1586175, 10.1193/1.1586175]
[17]  
Hisatoku T., 1995, P 64 ANN CONVENTION, P21
[18]   CYCLIC BEHAVIOR AND DESIGN OF LINK BEAMS [J].
HJELMSTAD, KD ;
POPOV, EP .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1983, 109 (10) :2387-2403
[19]   GENERAL BEHAVIOR OF WF STEEL SHEAR LINK BEAMS [J].
Kasai, Kazuhiko ;
Popov, Egor P. .
Journal of Structural Engineering (United States), 1986, 112 (02) :362-382
[20]   Damage-based seismic design of structures [J].
Khashaee, P .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2005, 21 (02) :371-387