Quantitative structure-activity relationships of selected phenols with non-monotonic dose-response curves

被引:6
作者
Gao ChangAn [1 ]
Zhang AiQian [1 ]
Lin Yuan [1 ]
Yin DaQiang [2 ]
Wang LianSheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Lab Pollut Control & Resource Reuse, Nanjing 210093, Peoples R China
[2] Tongji Univ, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, State Key Lab Pollut Control & Resource Reuse, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
来源
CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN | 2009年 / 54卷 / 10期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划);
关键词
phenols; non-monotonic dose-response relationship; toxicity mechanism; receptor-mediated process; homology modeling; QSAR; LIGAND-BINDING; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR; IN-SILICO; PREDICTION; EXPOSURE; HORMESIS; ESTRADIOL; MODEL; ACTIVATION; CELLS;
D O I
10.1007/s11434-009-0174-7
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Particular non-monotonic dose-response curves of many endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) suggest the existence of diverse toxicity mechanisms at different dose levels. As a result, the biological activities of EDCs cannot be simply exhibited by unique EC (50)/LD (50) values, and the quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis for non-monotonic dose-response relationship becomes an unknown field in the environmental science. In this paper, nine phenols with inverted U-shaped dose-response curves in lymphocyte proliferation test of Carassius auratus were selected. The binding interactions between the phenols and several typical EDCs-related receptors were then explored in a molecular simulation study. The estrogen receptor (ER), androgen receptor (AR), thyroid hormone receptor (TR), bacterial O-2 sensing FixL protein (FixL), aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), and the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) were the target receptors in the study. Linear regression QSAR models for the low and high exposure levels of the compounds were developed separately. The results indicated that the lymphocyte proliferation in the low-dose range might involve ER-mediated process, while the proliferation inhibition in the high dose range was dominated by the acute toxicity of phenols due to receptor occupancy and cell damage.
引用
收藏
页码:1786 / 1796
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quantitative structure-activity relationships and the prediction of MHC supermotifs
    Doytchinova, IA
    Guan, PP
    Flower, DR
    METHODS, 2004, 34 (04) : 444 - 453
  • [22] Quantitative structure-activity relationships of sweet isovanillyl derivatives
    Bassoli, A
    Drew, MGB
    Hattotuwagama, CK
    Merlini, L
    Morini, G
    Wilden, GRW
    QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIPS, 2001, 20 (01): : 3 - 16
  • [23] Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships of Aquatic Narcosis: A Review
    Adhikari, Chandana
    Mishra, Bijay Kumar
    CURRENT COMPUTER-AIDED DRUG DESIGN, 2018, 14 (01) : 7 - 28
  • [24] A quantitative structure-activity relationship study of the skin irritation potential of phenols
    Hayashi, M
    Nakamura, Y
    Higashi, K
    Kato, H
    Kishida, F
    Kaneko, H
    TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 1999, 13 (06) : 915 - 922
  • [25] Mechanism-based quantitative structure-activity relationships for the inhibition of substituted phenols on germination rate of Cucumis sativus
    Wang, XD
    Yu, JZ
    Wang, Y
    Wang, LS
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2002, 46 (02) : 241 - 250
  • [26] Prediction of toxicity of phenols and anilines to algae by quantitative structure-activity relationship
    Lu, Guang-Hua
    Wang, Chao
    Guo, Xiao-Ling
    BIOMEDICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2008, 21 (03) : 193 - 196
  • [27] Descriptor Selection Improvements for Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships
    Xia, Liang-Yong
    Wang, Qing-Yong
    Cao, Zehong
    Liang, Yong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEURAL SYSTEMS, 2019, 29 (09)
  • [28] Quantitative structure-activity relationships of α1 adrenergic antagonists
    Eric, S
    Solmajer, T
    Zupan, J
    Novic, M
    Oblak, M
    Agbaba, D
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MODELING, 2004, 10 (02) : 139 - 150
  • [30] Quantitative approaches for assessing dose-response relationships in genetic toxicology studies
    Gollapudi, B. B.
    Johnson, G. E.
    Hernandez, L. G.
    Pottenger, L. H.
    Dearfield, K. L.
    Jeffrey, A. M.
    Julien, E.
    Kim, J. H.
    Lovell, D. P.
    MacGregor, J. T.
    Moore, M. M.
    van Benthem, J.
    White, P. A.
    Zeiger, E.
    Thybaud, V.
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS, 2013, 54 (01) : 8 - 18