Development of an instrument to measure perceived cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning in traditional and virtual classroom higher education settings

被引:146
作者
Rovai, Alfred P. [1 ]
Wighting, Mervyn J. [1 ]
Baker, Jason D. [1 ]
Grooms, Linda D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Regent Univ, Sch Educ, Virginia Beach, VA 23464 USA
关键词
Perceived learning; Cognitive learning; Affective learning; Psychomotor learning; Distance education; Higher education; NONVERBAL IMMEDIACY; POWER; COMMUNICATION; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.002
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a self-report instrument that can be used to measure learning in the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains. The study underwent three phases, each with its own data collection and analysis. Phase I featured the development, testing, and factor analysis of an 80-item instrument that addressed cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning that was administered to a sample of 142 online and face-to-face learners. Based on the results, the instrument was reduced to 21 items for Phase 11 and tested with a new sample of 171 online and face-to-face students. The results of confirmatory factor analysis suggested a better data fit with an even smaller 9-item instrument, which was then administered to a new sample of 221 online and face-to-face students in Phase Ill. The results of this final phase are presented along with the resulting CAP Perceived Learning Scale, a 9-item self-report measure of perceived cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning. Implications and usage of the CAP Perceived Learning Scale for research and practice are also discussed. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 13
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Andersen J.F., 1979, COMMUNICATION YB, V3, P543, DOI [10.1080/23808985.1979.11923782, DOI 10.1080/23808985.1979.11923782]
[2]  
Anderson L., 2009, TAXONOMY LEARNING TE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1956, HDB 1 COGNITIVE DOMA
[4]  
Bem D.J., 1972, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, V6, P1
[5]   How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature [J].
Bernard, RM ;
Abrami, PC ;
Lou, YP ;
Borokhovski, E ;
Wade, A ;
Wozney, L ;
Wallet, PA ;
Fiset, M ;
Huang, BR .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 74 (03) :379-439
[6]   The relationship between students' reports of learning and their actual recall of lecture material: A validity test [J].
Chesebro, JL ;
McCroskey, JC .
COMMUNICATION EDUCATION, 2000, 49 (03) :297-301
[7]  
Corrallo S., 1994, National Center for Higher Education Management Systems, U.S. Department of Education, P94
[8]  
Dumont R. A., 1996, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communications, V39, P192, DOI 10.1109/47.544575
[9]  
Frymier A.B., 1999, Communication Studies, V50, P1, DOI DOI 10.1080/10510979909388466
[10]   Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions [J].
Garrison, D. Randy ;
Arbaugh, J.B. .
Internet and Higher Education, 2007, 10 (03) :157-172