Learning and Improving in Quality Improvement Collaboratives: Which Collaborative Features Do Participants Value Most?

被引:113
作者
Nembhard, Ingrid M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
Quality improvement collaboratives; organizational learning; CARE; RELIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00923.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
To understand participants' views on the relative helpfulness of various features of collaboratives, why each feature was helpful and which features the most successful participants viewed as most central to their success. Primary data collected from 53 teams in four 2004-2005 Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) Breakthrough Series collaboratives; secondary data from IHI and demographic sources. Cross-sectional analyses were conducted to assess participants' views of 12 features, and the relationship between their views and performance improvement. Participants' views on features were obtained via self-administered surveys and semi-structured telephone interviews. Performance improvement data were obtained from IHI and demographic data from secondary sources. Participants viewed six features as most helpful for advancing their improvement efforts overall and knowledge acquisition in particular: collaborative faculty, solicitation of their staff's ideas, change package, Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, Learning Session interactions, and collaborative extranet. These features also provided participants with motivation, social support, and project management skills. Features enabling interorganizational learning were rated higher by teams whose organizations improved significantly than by other teams. Findings identify features of collaborative design and implementation that participants view as most helpful and highlight the importance of interorganizational features, at least for those organizations that most improve.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 378
页数:20
相关论文
共 35 条
[21]   Improving the management of chronic disease at community health centers [J].
Landon, Bruce E. ;
Hicks, LeRoi S. ;
O'Malley, A. James ;
Lieu, Tracy A. ;
Keegan, Thomas ;
McNeil, Barbara J. ;
Guadagnoli, Edward .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (09) :921-934
[22]   Developing and implementing new safe practices: voluntary adoption through statewide collaboratives [J].
Leape, L. L. ;
Rogers, G. ;
Hanna, D. ;
Griswold, P. ;
Federico, F. ;
Fenn, C. A. ;
Bates, D. W. ;
Kirle, L. ;
Clarridge, B. R. .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2006, 15 (04) :289-295
[23]   The reliability of survey assessments of characteristics of medical clinics [J].
Marsden, PV ;
Landon, BE ;
Wilson, IB ;
McInnes, K ;
Hirschhorn, LR ;
Ding, L ;
Cleary, PD .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2006, 41 (01) :265-283
[24]  
Mills Peter D, 2004, Jt Comm J Qual Saf, V30, P152
[25]  
Morse J., 1994, HDB QUALITATIVE RES
[26]  
Morse J. M., 2002, README 1 USERS GUIDE
[27]  
Pawson R., 1997, Realistic Evaluation
[28]   Assessing the implementation of the chronic care model in quality improvement collaboratives [J].
Pearson, ML ;
Wu, SY ;
Schaefer, J ;
Bonomi, AE ;
Shortell, SM ;
Mendel, PJ ;
Marsteller, JA ;
Louis, TA ;
Rosen, M ;
Keeler, EB .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2005, 40 (04) :978-996
[29]   The role of perceived team effectiveness in improving chronic illness care [J].
Shortell, SM ;
Marsteller, JA ;
Lin, M ;
Pearson, ML ;
Wu, SY ;
Mendel, P ;
Cretin, S ;
Rosen, M .
MEDICAL CARE, 2004, 42 (11) :1040-1048