AN ENSEMBLE APPROACH FOR ROBUST DATA-DRIVEN PROGNOSTICS

被引:0
作者
Hu, Chao [1 ]
Youn, Byeng D. [1 ]
Wang, Pingfeng [1 ]
Yoon, Joung Taek [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Mech Engn, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE 2012, VOL 3, PTS A AND B | 2012年
关键词
CONDITION-BASED MAINTENANCE; RESIDUAL-LIFE DISTRIBUTIONS; OPTIMIZATION; SIMULATION; MODELS; SYSTEM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Prognostics aims at determining whether a failure of an engineered system (e.g., a nuclear power plant) is impending and estimating the remaining useful life (RUL) before the failure occurs. The traditional data-driven prognostic approach involves the following three steps: (Step 1) construct multiple I candidate algorithms using a training data set; (Step 2) evaluate their respective performance using a testing data set; and (Step 3) select the one with the best performance while discarding all the others. There are three main challenges in the traditional data-driven prognostic approach: (i) lack of robustness in the selected standalone algorithm; (ii) waste of the resources for constructing the algorithms that are discarded; and (iii) demand for the testing data in addition to the training data. To address these challenges, this paper proposes an ensemble approach for data-driven prognostics. This approach combines multiple member algorithms with a weighted-sum formulation where the weights are estimated by using one of the three weighting schemes, namely the accuracy-based weighting, diversity-based weighting and optimization-based weighting. In order to estimate the prediction error required by the accuracy- and optimization-based weighting schemes, we propose the use of the k-fold cross validation (CV) as a robust error estimator. The performance of the proposed ensemble approach is verified with three engineering case studies. It can be seen from all the case studies that the ensemble approach achieves better accuracy in RUL predictions compared to any sole algorithm when the member algorithms with good diversity show comparable prediction accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 347
页数:15
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Ensemble of metamodels with optimized weight factors [J].
Acar, E. ;
Rais-Rohani, M. .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2009, 37 (03) :279-294
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, INT JOINT C ARTIFICI, DOI 10.5555/1643031.1643047
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, SURVEY DATA DRIVEN P
[4]   Classifier-ensemble incremental-learning procedure for nuclear transient identification at different operational conditions [J].
Baraldi, Piero ;
Razavi-Far, Roozbeh ;
Zio, Enrico .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2011, 96 (04) :480-488
[5]   Simulation modelling of repairable multi-component deteriorating systems for 'on condition' maintenance optimisation [J].
Barata, J ;
Soares, CG ;
Marseguerra, M ;
Zio, E .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2002, 76 (03) :255-264
[6]  
Bishop C.M., 2005, NEURAL NETWORKS PATT
[7]  
Burger R., 1995, Cooling Tower Technology, Vthird
[8]   Model-based Monte Carlo state estimation for condition-based component replacement [J].
Cadini, F. ;
Zio, E. ;
Avram, D. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2009, 94 (03) :752-758
[9]  
CANU S, 2003, ADV LEARNING THEORY, V190, P89
[10]  
Cemansky M., 2007, NEURAL NETWORKS, V20, P236