REGULATION MECHANISM OF SYSTEMIC RISK IN AGRICULTURAL INSURANCE

被引:0
作者
Tsakayev, Alkhozur Kharonovich [1 ]
Saidov, Zaurbek Aslanbekovich [1 ]
机构
[1] Chechen State Univ, Grozny, Russia
来源
SOCIAL AND CULTURAL TRANSFORMATIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF MODERN GLOBALISM (SCTCGM 2018) | 2019年 / 58卷
关键词
Mechanism; risk; conflict; agricultural; insurance; partnership;
D O I
10.15405/epsbs.2019.03.02.138
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This paper deals with studies into possible stabilization of the Russian system of agricultural insurance in conditions of increased systemic risk. Presence of a systemic risk in activities of the national agricultural insurance has been confirmed. Risk-contributing factors in activities of participants of the Russian agricultural insurance are identified and grouped by cause and source of the systemic risk. In operational conditions of the Russian agricultural insurance system, the most significant source of the systemic risk is farmer, then the state, while the agricultural insurance underwriter is only third in significance. A mechanism is proposed for regulation of the systemic risk in the Russian agricultural insurance, providing, identification and analysis of systemic risk sources, causes and factors, development and implementation of preventive measures aimed at reducing the systemic risk on the basis of public-private partnership. The mechanism recommended by the authors is based on employing a mathematical apparatus that includes Ishikawa charts, STEEPL analysis, hierarchy analysis method, Pareto principle (20/80 rule) and a software solution for priority evaluation of alternative preventive risk aimed at risk localization. A differentiated list of 8 alternatives is given that allows localizing the conflict of interests in the subsidized agricultural insurance in Russia. Balanced development of the agricultural insurance in Russia is justified based on using advantages of both combined and mixed models. It has been shown that to use these models, the Russian agricultural insurance shall provide real public-private partnership allowing leveling a negative influence coming from sources of systemic risks. (C) 2019 Published by Future Academy www.FutureAcademy.org.UK
引用
收藏
页码:1193 / 1201
页数:9
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1985, What is Total Quality Control? The Japanese Way
[2]  
Belov I. V., 2014, YOUNG SCI, V8, P67
[3]  
Koch R., 2002, 80 20 REVOLUTION WHY
[4]  
Kulenkampff A., 2016, AGR INSURANCE LATIN
[5]  
Mahul O., 2015, ROLE PUBLIC SECTOR A
[6]  
Mahul O., 2010, Government support to agricultural insurance: challenges and options for developing countries, DOI 10.1142/s0219030302000514
[7]  
O'Connor J., 1997, ART SYSTEMS THINKING
[8]   An innovative orders-of-magnitude approach to AHP-based mutli-criteria decision making: Prioritizing divergent intangible humane acts [J].
Saaty, Thomas L. ;
Shang, Jennifer S. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2011, 214 (03) :703-715
[9]  
Tsakaev A, 2018, REV ESPAC, V39, P13, DOI [10.1093/ajae/aaw075, DOI 10.1093/AJAE/AAW075]
[10]  
Walden J., 2011, Comparison of the STEEPLE strategy methodology and the Department of Defense's PMESII-PT methodology