Bibliometric evaluation of Latin American contributions on COVID-19

被引:27
作者
Gregorio-Chaviano, Orlando [1 ]
Limaymanta, Cesar H. [2 ]
Lopez-Mesa, Evony K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Javeriana, Fac Comunicac & Lenguaje, Dept Ciencia Informac, Edificio Jose Rafael Arboleda,Transversal 4 42-00, Bogota, DC, Colombia
[2] Univ Peruana Ciencias Aplicadas, Dept Ciencias, Linea Estadist, Lima, Peru
[3] Univ La Gran Colombia, Coordinac Serv Usuario, Biblioteca, Bogota, DC, Colombia
来源
BIOMEDICA | 2020年 / 40卷
关键词
Coronavirus infections; bibliometrics; bibliometric indicators; information management; Latin America; SCIENCES;
D O I
10.7705/biomedica.5571
中图分类号
R188.11 [热带医学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: The propagation of COVID-19, an infectious disease caused by the novel SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, has become a pandemic which, along with its rapid dissemination worldwide, has brought about an exponential increase in the amount of research related to the subject to which Latin American researchers have contributed actively. Objective: To conduct a descriptive bibliometric study of the main trends in research on COVID-19 produced in Latin America. Materials and methods: We searched in the Web of Science, Scopus, and Pubmed databases to retrieve the Latin American scientific production on COVID-19. Bibliometric indicators of production, visibility, impact, and collaboration were analyzed to assess the regional participation in studies on the subject. Results: The analysis of 142 documents evidenced an exponential growth of scientific production in the period analyzed, an important level of international collaboration (51.4%) in scientific production, and the leadership of regional institutions (71%) in the research with publications in high-visibility jounals especially in Colombia, Brazil, and Mexico. Conclusions: The results regarding the regional participation in the research on COVID-19 were relevant not only in relation to its quantity and exponential growth during the period analyzed but also in terms of its quality and excellence with a high rate of international collaboration and publications in important scientific journals, which besides their visibility, represent a considerable contribution to the research compared to the other geographical contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 115
页数:12
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Measuring institutional research productivity for the life sciences: the importance of accounting for the order of authors in the byline
    Abramo, Giovanni
    D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea
    Rosati, Francesco
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2013, 97 (03) : 779 - 795
  • [2] Alba-Ruiz Ruben, 2020, ZENODO, DOI [10.5281/zenodo.3734062, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.3734062]
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1996, Investigacion Bibliotecologica, DOI [10.22201/iibi.0187358xp.1996.20.3835, DOI 10.22201/IIBI.0187358XP.1996.20.3835]
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1963, Little science, big science
  • [5] A Bibliometric Analysis of COVID-19 Research Activity: A Call for Increased Output
    Chahrour, Mohamad
    Assi, Sahar
    Bejjani, Michael
    Nasrallah, Ali A.
    Salhab, Hamza
    Fares, Mohamad Y.
    Khachfe, Hussein H.
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (03)
  • [6] Lotka's law for the Brazilian scientific output published in journals
    Da Silva, Sergio
    Perlin, Marcelo
    Matsushita, Raul
    Santos, Andre A. P.
    Imasato, Takeyoshi
    Borenstein, Denis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2019, 45 (05) : 705 - 709
  • [7] Leadership and excellence of Spanish science
    De-Moya-Anegon, Felix
    [J]. PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION, 2012, 21 (02): : 125 - 127
  • [8] Does newspapers coverage influence the citations count of scientific publications? An analysis of biomedical studies
    Dumas-Mallet, Estelle
    Garenne, Andre
    Boraud, Thomas
    Gonon, Francois
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2020, 123 (01) : 413 - 427
  • [9] Glänzel W, 2002, LIBR TRENDS, V50, P461
  • [10] Gonzalez PD, 2013, REV ESP DOC CIENT, V36