Quantification of solid waste management system efficiency using input-output indices

被引:24
作者
Bolingbroke, Damien [1 ]
Ng, Kelvin Tsun Wai [1 ]
Vu, Hoang Lan [1 ]
Richter, Amy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Regina, Environm Syst Engn, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, 3737 Wascana Pkwy, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Efficient waste management system; Municipal solid waste; Diversion efficiency; Cost-effectiveness; Diversion size indicator; Materials handled efficiency indicators; COST EFFICIENCY; LANDFILL SITES; COLLECTION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s10163-021-01187-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The assessment of solid waste management systems is vital for continued improvement in the efficiency of waste management systems (WMSs). Many studies have aimed to develop metrics that examine policy and system effectiveness, but there appears to be a lack of simple and comparable metrics to evaluate the WMS efficiency. This study introduces a set of novel waste diversion indicators, including a jurisdictionally comparable index known as diversion size indicator (DSI), and employs them to analyze WMSs in Canada. DSI increased in only a single province Nova Scotia during the 14-year study period. The DSI variability was largest for all Prairie Provinces, indicating that large efficiency changes in these province's WMSs over the study period. Combining all proposed metrics into a single rank showed that Saskatchewan outperformed all other Canadian jurisdictions, balancing diversion rate goals well with cost efficiency. Findings indicate that Alberta and Ontario rank very low in diversion efficiency and tonnage hauled efficiency. Also, Nova Scotia, the DSI leader, ranks lowest in terms of costs per tonne handled. Data availability remains a large barrier to a complete evaluation of WMSs. Nonetheless, the proposed original metrics create a framework for creating comparable and easy to use metrics for waste management efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:1015 / 1025
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, WASTE MANAGEMENT IND
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Waste Management Industry Survey: Business and Government Sectors 1998
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, WAST MAN IND SURV BU
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, North american industry classification system
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, WASTE MANAGEMENT IND
[6]  
[Anonymous], Table 38-10-0032-01 Disposal of waste, DOI DOI 10.25318/3810003201-ENG
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2008, WAST MAN IND SURV BU
[8]   The environmental comparison of landfilling vs. incineration of MSW accounting for waste diversion [J].
Assamoi, Bernadette ;
Lawryshyn, Yuri .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 32 (05) :1019-1030
[9]   Use of seasonal parameters and their effects on FOD landfill gas modeling [J].
Bruce, Nathan ;
Ng, Kelvin Tsun Wai ;
Hoang Lan Vu .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2018, 190 (05)
[10]   Alternative carbon dioxide modelling approaches accounting for high residual gases in LandGEM [J].
Bruce, Nathan ;
Ng, Kelvin Tsun Wai ;
Richter, Amy .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2017, 24 (16) :14322-14336