Profitable pollution abatement? A worker productivity perspective

被引:18
作者
Pang, Yu [1 ]
机构
[1] Macau Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Macau, Peoples R China
关键词
Pollution abatement; Worker productivity; Pollution tax; Social optimum; Voluntary environmental agreement; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; PORTER HYPOTHESIS; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; SELF-REGULATION; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; EMISSION TAXES; STANDARDS; COMPETITIVENESS; UNEMPLOYMENT; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.reseneeco.2017.12.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Based on the empirical evidence that improved environmental quality makes workers more productive, this paper develops a model that pollution abatement can raise firm profitability by enhancing worker productivity. We investigate two types of environmental regulations government intervention and voluntary regulation, showing that both can induce the collective action of imperfectly competitive firms to abate pollution, which increases their profits as well as social welfare. A pollution tax can prompt a firm to raise output if the productivity gain arising from total pollution reduction offsets the firm's pollution cost. We characterize the optimal pollution tax and demonstrate that the combination of a pollution tax and an output subsidy can lead to the social optimum. Voluntary regulation tends to fully internalize the productivity effect of reduced pollution for firms, although it facilitates firms' collusion in restricting production. Moreover, we conduct a simulation evaluating the welfare consequences of the two regulations in comparison with the social optimum. (C) 2017 ElsevierB.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 49
页数:17
相关论文
共 64 条
[51]   Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors [J].
Rubashkina, Yana ;
Galeotti, Marzio ;
Verdolini, Elena .
ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 83 :288-300
[52]   SYSTEMATIC JOB SEARCH AND UNEMPLOYMENT [J].
SALOP, SC .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1973, 40 (02) :191-201
[53]   Voluntary environmental agreements: Good or bad news for environmental protection? [J].
Segerson, K ;
Miceli, TJ .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1998, 36 (02) :109-130
[54]  
SHAPIRO C, 1984, AM ECON REV, V74, P433
[55]  
Shen T.T., 1999, IND POLLUTION PREVEN
[56]   INCENTIVES AND RISK SHARING IN SHARECOPPING [J].
STIGLITZ, JE .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1974, 41 (02) :219-255
[57]  
UNEP, 2007, LAB ENV NAT SYN
[58]  
Williams III R.C., 2015, IMPLEMENTING US CARB, P84
[59]   Health effects and optimal environmental taxes [J].
Williams, RC .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2003, 87 (02) :323-335
[60]   Environmental tax interactions when pollution affects health or productivity [J].
Williams, RC .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2002, 44 (02) :261-270