Profitable pollution abatement? A worker productivity perspective

被引:18
作者
Pang, Yu [1 ]
机构
[1] Macau Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Macau, Peoples R China
关键词
Pollution abatement; Worker productivity; Pollution tax; Social optimum; Voluntary environmental agreement; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; PORTER HYPOTHESIS; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; SELF-REGULATION; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; EMISSION TAXES; STANDARDS; COMPETITIVENESS; UNEMPLOYMENT; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.reseneeco.2017.12.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Based on the empirical evidence that improved environmental quality makes workers more productive, this paper develops a model that pollution abatement can raise firm profitability by enhancing worker productivity. We investigate two types of environmental regulations government intervention and voluntary regulation, showing that both can induce the collective action of imperfectly competitive firms to abate pollution, which increases their profits as well as social welfare. A pollution tax can prompt a firm to raise output if the productivity gain arising from total pollution reduction offsets the firm's pollution cost. We characterize the optimal pollution tax and demonstrate that the combination of a pollution tax and an output subsidy can lead to the social optimum. Voluntary regulation tends to fully internalize the productivity effect of reduced pollution for firms, although it facilitates firms' collusion in restricting production. Moreover, we conduct a simulation evaluating the welfare consequences of the two regulations in comparison with the social optimum. (C) 2017 ElsevierB.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 49
页数:17
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Adhvaryu A., 2014, MANAGEMENT SHO UNPUB
[2]   Collective voluntary agreements to eliminate polluting products [J].
Ahmed, Rasha ;
Segerson, Kathleen .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2011, 33 (03) :572-588
[3]   A theoretical foundation of the Porter hypothesis [J].
Ambec, S ;
Barla, P .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2002, 75 (03) :355-360
[4]   The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness? [J].
Ambec, Stefan ;
Cohen, Mark A. ;
Elgie, Stewart ;
Lanoie, Paul .
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2013, 7 (01) :2-22
[5]   Does It Pay to Be Green? A Systematic Overview [J].
Ambec, Stefan ;
Lanoie, Paul .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2008, 23 (04) :45-62
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Game Theory
[7]   Morally Motivated Self-Regulation [J].
Baron, David P. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2010, 100 (04) :1299-1329
[8]   A Positive Theory of Moral Management, Social Pressure, and Corporate Social Performance [J].
Baron, David P. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 2009, 18 (01) :7-43
[9]   Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy [J].
Baron, DP .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 2001, 10 (01) :7-45
[10]   Gray Matters: Fetal Pollution Exposure and Human Capital Formation [J].
Bharadwaj, Prashant ;
Gibson, Matthew ;
Zivin, Joshua Graff ;
Neilson, Christopher .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMISTS, 2017, 4 (02) :505-542