Ideas, power and agency: policy actors and the formulation of language-in-education policy for multilingualism

被引:3
作者
Erdocia, Iker [1 ]
Nocchi, Susanna [2 ]
Ruane, Mary [3 ]
机构
[1] Dublin City Univ, Sch Appl Language & Intercultural Studies, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Technol Univ Dublin, Sch Languages Law & Social Sci, Dublin, Ireland
[3] Univ Coll Cork, Sch Languages Literatures & Cultures, Dept Asian Studies, Cork, Ireland
关键词
Language policy and planning; language-in-education policy; language policy-making; Ireland; bilingualism; education policy; DISCURSIVE INSTITUTIONALISM; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1080/01434632.2022.2077352
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
The processes of formulation of language policies have not been researched thoroughly. This paper aims to explore the relationship between ideas, power and agency in language policy-making and specifically with reference to the formulation of language-in-education policy for multilingualism in Ireland. Through an argumentative approach to language policy and using a discursive institutionalist framework, the paper examines data from policy documents and interviews with policy actors in the Department of Education and Skills. The paper reports on the ways in which agentive discourses are constrained and enabled by institutional structures. The analysis shows how power resulting from asymmetric internal forces and the hierarchical architecture of institutions prevailed over the capacity of some actors to promote their ideas through discourse. Moreover, it shows how static ideational elements are powerful structural constraints on agency. The paper argues for a conceptualisation of actors in policy-making as agentive individuals who engage in a dynamic struggle over ideas to realise complex and changing policy goals. It concludes by claiming that a focus on discursive forms of power in the policy analysis at the so-called macro level would be beneficial for language policy scholarship.
引用
收藏
页码:2848 / 2862
页数:15
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Ayres-Bennett W., 2018, Languages After Brexit: How the UK Speaks to the World, P231
[2]   Agency in educational language planning: perspectives from higher education in Tunisia [J].
Badwan, Khawla .
CURRENT ISSUES IN LANGUAGE PLANNING, 2021, 22 (1-2) :99-116
[3]  
Barakos E., 2016, Discursive approaches to language policy
[4]   Power in international politics [J].
Barnett, M ;
Duvall, R .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2005, 59 (01) :39-75
[5]  
Beland Daniel., 2011, IDEAS POLITICS SOCIA
[6]  
Bouchard J, 2019, ROUTL CRIT STUD MULT, P1
[7]  
Bouchard J, 2019, ROUTL CRIT STUD MULT, P22
[8]  
Bruen J., 2021, Language learning in anglophone countries: challenges, policies, ways forward, P37
[9]  
Bruen J., 2013, European Journal Of Language Policy, V5, P99, DOI [10.3828/ejlp.2013.5, DOI 10.3828/EJLP.2013.5]
[10]   Ideas, politics, and public policy [J].
Campbell, JL .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 2002, 28 :21-38