Roof-arc angle and weight-bearing area of the acetabulum

被引:28
作者
Chuckpaiwong, Bavornrit [1 ]
Suwanwong, Pornsawat [1 ]
Harnroongroj, Thossart [1 ]
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Siriraj Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2009年 / 40卷 / 10期
关键词
Acetabular fracture; Weight bearing; Roof-arc angle; Radiography; Trauma; Surgery; SIMULATED TRANSVERSE; HIP-JOINT; FRACTURES; REDUCTION; STABILITY; STRESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2009.01.016
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Unreduced fracture crossing the weight-bearing dome of the acetabulum leads to arthritis. Thus the integrity of the weight-bearing dome is considered to be an important prognostic indicator for acetabular fracture. The decision of whether or not to operate is based on the location of the fracture relative to the weight-bearing dome. A displaced fracture crossing the weight-bearing dome is an indication for surgery. Objective: To measure the medial, anterior, and posterior roof-arc angles that cross the weight-bearing dome. Methods: Twenty cadeveric hip joints were dissected and simulated transverse fractures of acetabuli through the transtectal area were made. The radiographic examinations were taken in three views: AP, obturator oblique, and iliac oblique. Roof-arc angle was measured in all three views (medial, anterior, and posterior). Results: The medial roof-arc angle was 46 +/- 6.3 degrees, anterior roof-arc angle was 52 +/- 7.0 degrees, and posterior roof-arc angle was 62 degrees +/- 8.5 degrees. Conclusions: In acetabular fracture, a medial roof-arc angle less than 46 degrees, an anterior roof-arc angle less than 52 degrees, or posterior roof-arc angle less than 61 degrees is considered to be involved in a weight-bearing area. Clinical relevance: These roof-arc angle values may be used as a surgical guideline for an acetabular fracture around the weight-bearing area. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1064 / 1066
页数:3
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
BOMBELLI R, 1993, STRUCTURE FUNCTION N, P1
[2]   CONTACT PRESSURES IN LOADED HUMAN CADAVER HIP [J].
DAY, WH ;
SWANSON, SAV ;
FREEMAN, MAR .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1975, 57 (03) :302-313
[3]   Mathematical modelling of stress in the hip during gait [J].
Ipavec, M ;
Brand, RA ;
Pedersen, DR ;
Mavcic, B ;
Kralj-Iglic, V ;
Iglic, A .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1999, 32 (11) :1229-1235
[4]   Increased peak contact stress after incongruent reduction of transverse acetabular fractures: A cadaveric model [J].
Malkani, AL ;
Voor, MJ ;
Rennirt, G ;
Helfet, D ;
Pedersen, D ;
Brown, T .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2001, 51 (04) :704-709
[5]  
MATTA JM, 1986, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P241
[6]  
MATTA JM, 1986, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P230
[7]   Fractures of the acetabulum: Accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury [J].
Matta, JM .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1996, 78A (11) :1632-1645
[8]  
MATTA JM, 1988, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P83
[9]  
Olson SA, 1997, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P92
[10]   THE COMPUTERIZED-TOMOGRAPHY SUBCHONDRAL ARC - A NEW METHOD OF ASSESSING ACETABULAR ARTICULAR CONTINUITY AFTER FRACTURE (A PRELIMINARY-REPORT) [J].
OLSON, SA ;
MATTA, JM .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 1993, 7 (05) :402-413