Selection bias correction for species sensitivity distribution modeling and hazardous concentration estimation

被引:9
作者
Fox, David R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Environmetr Australia, Beaumaris, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
关键词
Species sensitivity distribution; Nonrandom selection; Hazardous concentration; NOEC TOXICITY DATA; STATISTICAL-METHODS; RISK-ASSESSMENT; FRESH-WATER; ASSUMPTIONS; PROTECTION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1002/etc.3098
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The species sensitivity distribution (SSD) has been an important development in ecotoxicology, and despite numerous concerns having been raised over many years, it remains the preferred (and often mandated) technique for establishing safe concentrations of contaminants in receiving water bodies by jurisdictions around the world. Although universally recognized as a crucial prerequisite for the statistical validity of the procedure, the assumption of random selection of species for SSD modeling is invariably violated. It is shown in the present study that, under very minimal assumptions, nonrandom species selection can result in hazardous concentration estimation errors of a factor of 20 or more. Importantly, if the toxicity data are biased toward the more sensitive species, then the conventional practice of using the lower confidence interval limit for the estimated hazardous concentration may be compensating in the wrong direction. Environ Toxicol Chem 2015;34:2555-2563. (c) 2015 SETAC
引用
收藏
页码:2555 / 2563
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Ahmad S., 2012, INT J APPL SCI TECHN, V2, P106
[2]   CONFIDENCE-LIMITS FOR HAZARDOUS CONCENTRATIONS BASED ON LOGISTICALLY DISTRIBUTED NOEC TOXICITY DATA [J].
ALDENBERG, T ;
SLOB, W .
ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 1993, 25 (01) :48-63
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, INTRO BOOTSTRAP
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, SPECIES SENSITIVITY, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781420032314
[5]  
Batley G., 2014, TECHNICAL RATIONALE
[6]  
Campbell E., 2000, BurrliOZ: a computer program for calculating toxicant trigger values for the ANZECC and ARMCANZ water quality guidelines
[7]   A conservative, nonparametric estimator for the 5th percentile of the species sensitivity distributions [J].
Chen, L .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2004, 123 (02) :243-258
[8]   Risk assessment using the species sensitivity distribution method: Data quality versus data quantity [J].
Dowse, Renee ;
Tang, Doudou ;
Palmer, Carolyn G. ;
Kefford, Ben J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2013, 32 (06) :1360-1369
[9]   Effects of data manipulation and statistical methods on species sensitivity distributions [J].
Duboudin, C ;
Ciffroy, P ;
Magaud, H .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2004, 23 (02) :489-499
[10]  
ECHA (European Chemicals Agency), 2008, Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment chapter R.10: Characterisation of dose [concentration]-response for environment