Bone stiffness predicts strength similarly for human vertebral cancellous bone in compression and for cortical bone in tension

被引:107
作者
Fyhrie, DP [1 ]
Vashishth, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Henry Ford Hosp, Ctr Bone & Joint, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
关键词
strength; stiffness; yield strain; cortical bone; cancellous bone; adaptation;
D O I
10.1016/S8756-3282(99)00246-X
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The yield strength and ultimate strength of cortical and cancellous bone tissue are very highly correlated to bone stiffness. For samples of human vertebral cancellous bone in compression and for bovine cortical bone in tension, the coefficient of determination (r(2)) for regression between ultimate strength and stiffness was 0.89 and 0.92, and between yield strength and stiffness it was 0.94 and 0.93, respectively. The slope of the regression for human vertebral cancellous bone ultimate strength predicted by stiffness was not statistically different from similar regressions for cortical bone in tension in either a bovine sample or in published data from multiple species. We believe that the observed correlation results from the evolutionary need to build sufficiently strong bones using cells that are sensitive to deformation and that directly control bone stiffness, but not strength. The practical significance of this work is that an in vivo estimate of bone stiffness (e.g., from ultrasound measurement) may be a surrogate for bone strength. (C) 2000 by Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 173
页数:5
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
*ASTM, 1998, E8M1998 ASTM
[2]   ULTRASONIC ANALYSIS OF THE YOUNG MODULUS OF CORTICAL BONE [J].
BONFIELD, W ;
TULLY, AE .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1982, 4 (01) :23-27
[3]   MECHANICAL PROPERTY DISTRIBUTIONS IN THE CANCELLOUS BONE OF THE HUMAN PROXIMAL FEMUR [J].
BROWN, TD ;
FERGUSON, AB .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1980, 51 (03) :429-437
[4]   AGING OF BONE TISSUE - MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES [J].
BURSTEIN, AH ;
REILLY, DT ;
MARTENS, M .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1976, 58 (01) :82-86
[5]   COMPRESSIVE BEHAVIOR OF BONE AS A 2-PHASE POROUS STRUCTURE [J].
CARTER, DR ;
HAYES, WC .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1977, 59 (07) :954-962
[6]   BONE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH - INFLUENCE OF DENSITY AND STRAIN RATE [J].
CARTER, DR ;
HAYES, WC .
SCIENCE, 1976, 194 (4270) :1174-1176
[7]   Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA [J].
Cody, DD ;
Gross, GJ ;
Hou, FJ ;
Spencer, HJ ;
Goldstein, SA ;
Fyhrie, DP .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1999, 32 (10) :1013-1020
[8]  
Currey J., 1984, The Mechanical Adaptations of Bones
[10]   PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AFFECTING THE TENSILE FAILURE PROPERTIES OF COMPACT-BONE [J].
CURREY, JD .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1990, 23 (08) :837-844